Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35281136›Full record

ArticleJournal of oral and maxillofacial pathology : JOMFP

Analysis of antimicrobial activity of Karnataka propolis against oral pathogens - An

Sowmya Srinivas, Anil Kumar Gujjari, Mruthunjaya Kenganora, Sushma Rudraswamy, M B Ravi, S Manjula

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of oral and maxillofacial pathology : JOMFP. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sowmya SrinivasDepartment of Prosthodontics, JSS Dental College and Hospital, JSSAHER, Mysuru, Karnataka, India.
Anil Kumar GujjariDepartment of Prosthodontics, JSS Dental College and Hospital, JSSAHER, Mysuru, Karnataka, India.
Mruthunjaya KenganoraDepartment of Pharmacognosy, JSS College of Pharmacy, JSSAHER, Mysuru, Karnataka, India.
Sushma RudraswamyDepartment of Public Health and Community Dentistry, JSS Dental College and Hospital, JSSAHER, Mysuru, Karnataka, India.
M B RaviDepartment of Prosthodontics, JSS Dental College and Hospital, JSSAHER, Mysuru, Karnataka, India.
S ManjulaDepartment of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, JSS Dental College and Hospital, JSSAHER, Mysuru, Karnataka, India.
JSS Dental College and Hospital · INJSS Academy of Higher Education and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Propolis, a natural antibiotic, which is in high demand in dentistry is a resinous substance. The main ingredient of propolis that is required for antibiotic effect is flavonoids and phenolic acids. Although propolis is a promising option for the control of oral microbes with lower related hazards and a good immunomodulator effect, its composition differs considerably depending on its botanical origin, the site and the season of collection. This original research aims to find the chemical composition and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of propolis procured from different places of Karnataka state. The results would help the dentist and the pharmacist to select the best propolis to use as antibiotics in treating oral disease. Materials and Methods: Propolis sample from 5 different locations of Karnataka was procured from single apiary in Bangalore. Extraction of propolis using two different extracting solvents was carried out. The total phenolic content, total flavonoid content and MIC of each sample were analyzed. Results: Water extract propolis of Sullia and Hubli was highly active against tested organism with the MIC <0.312; alcohol extract of Sullia, Hubli and Chitradurga was moderately active with the MIC between 0.312 and 5 mg/ml. Vijayapura and Bagalkot were least active with the MIC >5 mg/ml at tested concentration. Conclusion: Propolis procured from different locations of Karnataka can be used as an antimicrobial agent with varying concentrations. However, when propolis is procured for therapeutic purpose, then it needs to be tested for its chemical composition before being utilized.

Indexed as

Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitansCandida albicansflavonoid contentphenolic contentpropolisStaphylococcus aureusStreptococcus mutans

Identifiers

PMID35281136
PMCPMC8859580
OpenAlexW4206465993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.