ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022
Corneal Biomechanics Differences Between Chinese and Caucasian Healthy Subjects.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Continuous Severity Index for Keratoconus Diagnosis Based on Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks in a Chinese Population.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- The Corvis ST analysis of underaged versus adults' healthy eyes with comparable tomography detects softer corneas in children and adolescents as opposed to adults.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Corneal biomechanics with CORVIS-ST in post-keratoplasty corneas.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2026Observational
- Quantitative assessment of the biomechanical properties of healthy human myopic corneas using Brillouin spectroscopy.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
- The relationship between corneal biomechanics and endothelial morphology: evidence from a Saudi cohort.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Early diagnosis of keratoconus using corneal biomechanics and OCT derived technologies.Eye and vision (London, England) · 2025Review
- Differences between suspected keratoconus and subclinical keratoconus via multiparameter analysis in Chinese populations.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Short-Term Efficacy and Safety of Scleral Lenses in the Management of Severe Dry Eye in a Chinese Population.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Short-term digital ocular massage may weaken corneal biomechanics.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Age-related analysis of corneal biomechanical parameters in healthy Chinese individuals.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Longitudinal Analysis of Corneal Biomechanics of Suspect Keratoconus: A Prospective Case-Control Study.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Refractive associations with corneal biomechanical properties among young adults: a population-based Corvis ST study.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2024Article
- Characterization of Corneal Biomechanics Using CORVIS ST Device in Different Grades of Myopia in a Sample of Middle Eastern Ethnicity.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2024Article
- New dawn for keratoconus treatment: potential strategies for corneal stromal regeneration.Stem cell research & therapy · 2023Review
- Biomechanical properties analysis of forme fruste keratoconus and subclinical keratoconus.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2023Article
- Change in the corneal material mechanical property for small incision lenticule extraction surgery.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Effect of myopia and astigmatism deepening on the corneal biomechanical parameter stress-strain index in individuals of Chinese ethnicity.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Article
- The role of anterior segment biomarkers in the development and progression of myopia.Taiwan journal of ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the difference between Caucasian and Chinese healthy subjects with regards to Corvis ST dynamic corneal response parameters (DCRs). Methods: Two thousand eight hundred and eighty-nine healthy Caucasian and Chinese subjects were included in this multicenter retrospective study. Subsequently, Chinese eyes were matched to Caucasians by age, intraocular pressure (IOP), and Corneal Thickness (CCT) using a case-control matching algorithm. The DCRs assessed were Deformation Amplitude (DA) Applanation 1 velocity (A1v), integrated radius (1/R), deformation amplitude ratio (DAratio), stiffness parameter at applanation 1 (SPA1), ARTh (Ambrósio's Relational Thickness to the horizontal profile), and the novel Stress Strain Index (SSI). Results: After age-, CCT-, and IOP- matching, 503 Chinese were assigned to 452 Caucasians participants. Statistical analysis showed a statistical significant difference between Chinese and Caucasian Healthy subjects in the values of SPA1 ( Conclusion: We found significant differences in the values of the DCRs provided by the Corvis ST between Chinese and Caucasian healthy subjects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.