ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022
Identification of Signature Genes and Characterizations of Tumor Immune Microenvironment and Tumor Purity in Lung Adenocarcinoma Based on Machine Learning.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical attribute-based risk matrix for prognostication in immunotherapy-treated non-small cell lung cancer.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Hydrogen sulfide regulation in redox homeostasis and programmed cell death: mechanistic insights and implications in cancer.Journal of advanced research · 2026Review
- Patient-specific lung cancer tumoroids recapitulate the tumor microenvironments for functional evaluation of therapeutic responses and immune-stromal interactions.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Metabolic [¹⁸F]F-AraG PET imaging of T Cell activation: a functional complement to cell-specific immune tracers.EJNMMI research · 2026Review
- Prognostic value and biological role of STING-related genes GAB3 and IL16 in lung adenocarcinoma: implications for immune evasion and treatment.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The Interaction Between Vasculogenic Mimicry and the Immune System: Mechanistic Insights and Dual Exploration in Cancer Therapy.Cell proliferation · 2025Review
- Identification of Prognostic Genes and Immune Landscape Signatures Based on Tumor Microenvironment in Lung Adenocarcinoma.Disease markers · 2022Article
- Identification of Biomarkers Associated With CD4Frontiers in immunology · 2022Article
- Identification of molecular subtypes and prognostic model to reveal immune infiltration and predict prognosis based on immunogenic cell death-related genes in lung adenocarcinoma.Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The implication of the Estimation of Stromal and Immune cells in Malignant tumor tissues using expression data (ESTIMATE) method to determine the tumor microenvironment (TME) and tumor immune score including tumor purity represents an efficient method to identify and assess biomarkers for immunotherapy response in precision medicine. In this study we utilized a machine learning algorithm to analyze the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus database (GEO) lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) transcriptome data to evaluate the association between TME and tumor purity. Furthermore, we investigated whether fewer TME components or a few dominant genes can infer tumor purity. The results indicated that the 29 immune infiltrating components determined by the ssGSEA method could screen the 5 TME components [chemokine C-C-Motif receptor (CCR), T-helper-cells, Check-point, Treg, and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL)] that significantly contributed the most to tumor purity prediction through regression tree and random forest regression methods. The findings revealed that higher activity of these five immune infiltrating components significantly lowered the tumor purity. Moreover, 5 TME components contributed significantly to the improvement of Mean Square Error (MES); therefore, we selected these five sets' genes and analyzed survival data to establish a prognostic model. We screened out 11 prognostic-related genes and constructed a risk model comprising 11 genes with good predictive value for patients' prognosis. Furthermore, we obtained four genes (GIMAP6, CD80, IL16, and CCR2) that had predictive advantages for tumor purity using random forest classification and random forest regression. The comprehensive score of genes for tumor purity prediction (CSGTPP) was obtained by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression indicated that four genes could be successfully used to classify high and low CSGTPP samples and that tumor purity was negatively correlated with CSGTPP. Survival analysis revealed that the higher the CSGTPP, the better the prognosis of patients. The association between a cluster of differentiation 274 (CD274) and CSGTPP revealed a higher expression of CD274 in the high CSGTPP group. Collectively, we speculated that CSGTPP could serve as a predictor of the response to immunotherapy and a promising indicator of immunotherapy effect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.