ArticleTransport policy2022
Coronavirus disease 2019 and the global economy.
Article in Transport policy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Theoretical biological activities and docking studies of new derivatives of acyclovir for the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019.Journal of medicine and life · 2024Article
- Overlaid Lateral Flow Immunoassay for the Simultaneous Detection of Two Variant-Specific SARS-CoV-2 Neutralizing Antibodies.Analytical chemistry · 2024Article
- Cruising through a pandemic: Or not?Annals of tourism research · 2022Article
- COVID-19 impact on multifractality of energy prices: Asymmetric multifractality analysis.Energy (Oxford, England) · 2022Article
- The impact of health and economic policies on the spread of COVID-19 and economic activity.European economic review · 2022Article
- Examining the behaviour of energy prices to COVID-19 uncertainty: A quantile on quantile approach.Energy (Oxford, England) · 2022Article
- Article
- The bubble contagion effect of COVID-19 outbreak: Evidence from crude oil and gold markets.Finance research letters · 2021Article
- Stock Market Reactions to COVID-19 Pandemic Outbreak: Quantitative Evidence from ARDL Bounds Tests and Granger Causality Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Information Search and Financial Markets under COVID-19.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- How do equity markets react to COVID-19? Evidence from emerging and developed countries.Journal of economics and businessArticle
- Risk perception and oil and gasoline markets under COVID-19.Journal of economics and businessArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Using daily data on the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases from China and the rest of the world, this paper investigates the corresponding effects on the global economic activity. The empirical results based on a structural vector autoregression model using crude oil prices (COP) and the Baltic Exchange Dry Index (BDI) are consistent with increases in COVID-19 cases acting as negative demand shocks in the global economic activity (reflected as reductions in COP) and negative supply shocks in the global transportation of commodities (reflected as increases in BDI). The historical decomposition results further suggest that the effects of COVID-19 cases on COP and BDI have been mostly observed in the early COVID-19 period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.