Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35280772›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

A Novel Radiotherapeutic Approach to Treat Bulky Metastases Even From Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Its Rationale and a Look at the Reliability of the Linear-Quadratic Model to Explain Its Radiobiological Effects.

Gianluca Ferini, Paolo Castorina, Vito Valenti, Salvatore Ivan Illari, Ilias Sachpazidis, Luigi Castorina, Maurizio Marrale, Stefano Pergolizzi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Gianluca FeriniDepartment of Radiation Oncology, REM Radioterapia srl, Viagrande, Italy.
Paolo CastorinaIstituto Oncologico del Mediterraneo, Viagrande, Italy.
Vito ValentiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, REM Radioterapia srl, Viagrande, Italy.
Salvatore Ivan IllariDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fondazione IOM, Viagrande, Italy.
Ilias SachpazidisDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Division of Medical Physics, Medical Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Luigi CastorinaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, REM Radioterapia srl, Viagrande, Italy.
Maurizio MarraleDepartment of Physics and Chemistry, "Emilio Segrè" ATeN Center, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Stefano PergolizziDipartimento di Scienze Biomediche, Odontoiatriche e delle Immagini Morfologiche e Funzionali Università di Messina, Messina, Italy.
Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare · ITUniversity of Freiburg · DEUniversity of Messina · ITUniversity of Palermo · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is a very rare condition. The lack of definition of an oligometastatic subgroup means that there is no consensus for its treatment, unlike the mucosal head and neck counterpart. Like the latter, the cutaneous form is able to develop bulky tumor masses. When this happens, the classic care approach is just for palliative intent due to a likely unfavorable benefit-risk balance typical of aggressive treatments. Here we proposed a novel radiotherapy (RT) technique to treat bulky metastases from cSCC in the context of an overall limited tumor burden and tried to explain its clinical outcome by the currently available mathematical radiobiological and Methods: We treated a case of facial cSCC with three metastases: two of them by classic stereotactic RT and the other by lattice RT supported by metabolic imaging ( Results: We observed a clinical complete response in all three disease sites; the bulky metastasis actually regressed more rapidly than the other two treated by stereotactic RT. For the large lesion, NTCP predictions were good for all four different plans but even significantly better for the lattice RT plan. Neither the classic TCP nor the Conclusions: PET-guided lattice RT might be safe and effective for the treatment of bulky lesions from cSCC. There might be some need for complex mathematical radiobiological models that are able to take into account any immune system's role in order to explain the possible mechanisms of the tumor response to radiation and the relevant key points to enhance it.

Indexed as

bulky tumorscutaneous squamous cell carcinomaimmunotherapylattice radiotherapymetabolic tumor volumenormal tissue complication probability (NTCP)spatially fractionated radiation therapytumor control probability (TCP)

Identifiers

PMID35280772
PMCPMC8904747
OpenAlexW4214649693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.