Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35280708›Full record

ArticleContrast media & molecular imaging2022

Ensemble Deep Learning and Internet of Things-Based Automated COVID-19 Diagnosis Framework.

Anita S Kini, A Nanda Gopal Reddy, Manjit Kaur, S Satheesh, Jagendra Singh, Thomas Martinetz, Hammam Alshazly

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contrast media & molecular imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Anita S KiniManipal Institute of Technology MAHE, Manipal, Karnataka 576104, India.ORCID 0000-0002-7823-7142
A Nanda Gopal ReddyDepartment of IT, Mahaveer Institute of Science and Technology, Hyderabad, Telangana 500005, India.ORCID 0000-0003-3252-5285
Manjit KaurSchool of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology, Gwangju 61005, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-6259-2046
S SatheeshDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Malineni Lakshmaiah Women's Engineering College, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh 522017, India.ORCID 0000-0002-4235-6334
Jagendra SinghSchool of Computer Science Engineering and Technology, Bennett University, Greater Noida-203206, India.ORCID 0000-0002-6871-2050
Thomas MartinetzInstitute for Neuro- and Bioinformatics, University of Lübeck, Lübeck 23562, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4539-4475
Hammam AlshazlyFaculty of Computers and Information, South Valley University, Qena 83523, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-9942-8642
Bennett University · INGwangju Institute of Science and Technology · KRManipal Academy of Higher Education · INSouth Valley University · EGUniversity of Lübeck · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is a viral infection caused by SARS-CoV-2. The modalities such as computed tomography (CT) have been successfully utilized for the early stage diagnosis of COVID-19 infected patients. Recently, many researchers have utilized deep learning models for the automated screening of COVID-19 suspected cases. An ensemble deep learning and Internet of Things (IoT) based framework is proposed for screening of COVID-19 suspected cases. Three well-known pretrained deep learning models are ensembled. The medical IoT devices are utilized to collect the CT scans, and automated diagnoses are performed on IoT servers. The proposed framework is compared with thirteen competitive models over a four-class dataset. Experimental results reveal that the proposed ensembled deep learning model yielded 98.98% accuracy. Moreover, the model outperforms all competitive models in terms of other performance metrics achieving 98.56% precision, 98.58% recall, 98.75% F-score, and 98.57% AUC. Therefore, the proposed framework can improve the acceleration of COVID-19 diagnosis.

Indexed as

COVID-19 TestingNeural Networks, ComputerSARS-CoV-2Tomography, X-Ray ComputedCOVID-19FemaleHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID35280708
PMCPMC8896964
OpenAlexW4214746462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.