ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2022
Using clinical data to predict obstructive sleep apnea.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic utility of obstructive sleep apnea screening questionnaires: a comprehensive meta-analysis.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2024Pooled it
- The Obstructive Sleep Apnea Physical Exam: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2025Review
- A novel machine learning model for screening the risk of obstructive sleep apnea using craniofacial photography with questionnaires.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2025Article
- Polysomnographic Analysis in Snoring Patients.Cureus · 2025Article
- Advances in Machine Learning Prediction Models for the Screening of Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Adults.Nature and science of sleep · 2025Review
- Prevalence of excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) and its association with quality of life in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA): data from a sleep-center in Shenzhen, a single-center cross-sectional study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2024Article
- Application and interpretation of machine learning models in predicting the risk of severe obstructive sleep apnea in adults.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common disorder and associated with motor vehicle accidents, reduced quality of life and various comorbidities. It is necessary to identify clinical parameters that may predict the presence and severity of OSA. Methods: Subjects with suspected OSA were consecutively recruited for development and validation of the models. Clinical data collected from participants included general information, OSA-related symptoms, questionnaire responses, and physical examination. Logistic and linear regressions were used to develop models to determine the presence and severity of OSA. Results: All 202 subjects (157 men, 45 women; age range, 18-68 years) underwent polysomnography (PSG) and clinical assessment, of whom 62.3% were diagnosed with OSA. The presence of OSA was defined using the equation, 1.00 × central obesity + 2.05 × snoring + 1.80 × witnessed nocturnal apnea + 1.73 × lateral narrowing - 3.25; and apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) was defined using, 12.5 × central obesity + 17.1 × witnessed nocturnal apnea + 6.2 × tonsillar size + 9.0 × lateral narrowing - 19.7. The model demonstrated a sensitivity of 81.1% (95% CI: 73.2-87.5%) and a specificity of 76.0% (95% CI: 64.7-85.1%) at the optimal cut-off value for OSA detection. The positive and negative likelihood ratios were 3.4 (95% CI: 2.2-5.1) and 0.3 (95% CI: 0.2-0.4), respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the predictive model (83.7%) was significantly greater than that of the Berlin Questionnaire (53.5%), Epworth Sleepiness Scale (61.1%), and STOP-BANG questionnaire (73.8%). 101 subjects were recruited as the validation group. The models to determine the presence and severity of OSA had an accuracy of 0.812 and 0.416 in the validation group. Conclusions: Results of the present study suggest that a combination of clinical data may be helpful in identify patients who are at increased risk for OSA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.