Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35280490›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2022

Using clinical data to predict obstructive sleep apnea.

Shuai He, Yanru Li, Wen Xu, Demin Han

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. A novel machine learning model for screening the risk of obstructive sleep apnea using craniofacial photography with questionnaires.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shuai HeBeijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yanru LiBeijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Wen XuBeijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Demin HanBeijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China · CNBeijing Tongren Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common disorder and associated with motor vehicle accidents, reduced quality of life and various comorbidities. It is necessary to identify clinical parameters that may predict the presence and severity of OSA. Methods: Subjects with suspected OSA were consecutively recruited for development and validation of the models. Clinical data collected from participants included general information, OSA-related symptoms, questionnaire responses, and physical examination. Logistic and linear regressions were used to develop models to determine the presence and severity of OSA. Results: All 202 subjects (157 men, 45 women; age range, 18-68 years) underwent polysomnography (PSG) and clinical assessment, of whom 62.3% were diagnosed with OSA. The presence of OSA was defined using the equation, 1.00 × central obesity + 2.05 × snoring + 1.80 × witnessed nocturnal apnea + 1.73 × lateral narrowing - 3.25; and apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) was defined using, 12.5 × central obesity + 17.1 × witnessed nocturnal apnea + 6.2 × tonsillar size + 9.0 × lateral narrowing - 19.7. The model demonstrated a sensitivity of 81.1% (95% CI: 73.2-87.5%) and a specificity of 76.0% (95% CI: 64.7-85.1%) at the optimal cut-off value for OSA detection. The positive and negative likelihood ratios were 3.4 (95% CI: 2.2-5.1) and 0.3 (95% CI: 0.2-0.4), respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the predictive model (83.7%) was significantly greater than that of the Berlin Questionnaire (53.5%), Epworth Sleepiness Scale (61.1%), and STOP-BANG questionnaire (73.8%). 101 subjects were recruited as the validation group. The models to determine the presence and severity of OSA had an accuracy of 0.812 and 0.416 in the validation group. Conclusions: Results of the present study suggest that a combination of clinical data may be helpful in identify patients who are at increased risk for OSA.

Indexed as

clinical variablesObstructive sleep apnea (OSA)prediction

Identifiers

PMID35280490
PMCPMC8902098
OpenAlexW4205869648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.