ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2022
Narrative review: association between lung cancer development and ambient particulate matter in never-smokers.
Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Airborne PMInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Fatty liver index and development of lung cancer: a nationwide cohort study.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2025Article
- Long-term exposure to fine particulate matter, ozone, and greenness and the risk of lung cancer: a retrospective cohort analysis within a national sample cohort.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To review the association and pathophysiological link between lung cancer in never smokers and ambient particulate matter (PM). Background: Although the association between exposure to PM and lung cancer development is well known, the pathophysiological background is yet to be studied in depth. Never smokers comprise a large proportion of newly diagnosed lung cancer cases and account for 25% of all cases. Considering the carcinogenic nature of ambient PM and the fact that many patients with lung cancer are never smokers, it is necessary to evaluate the interrelation and possible clinical background, in order to effectively prevent lung cancer development in this subgroup. Methods: An online search of literature was conducted. The National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library and EMBASE were searched. Conclusions: In never smokers, the risk of lung cancer was dose-dependent with the concentration of ambient air pollutants. Regarding the pathophysiological link, involvement of epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT) and chronic inflammation has been mentioned, but further studies are necessary to enable therapeutic interventions to prevent cancer development. Considering the significant burden of PM on lung cancer development, both public and clinical approaches to cancer prevention are essential. To prevent lung cancer more effectively, clinicians should develop a more individualized approach in patients, focusing on gender and genetic background.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.