ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2022
Textbook outcome after minimally invasive esophagectomy is an important prognostic indicator for predicting long-term oncological outcomes with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The "Textbook Outcome" Isn't Textbook: Significant Variation in "Textbook Outcome" Definitions following a Systematic Review of the Surgical Oncology Literature.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Impact of Textbook Outcome (TO) and Textbook Oncological Outcome (TOO) on Survival Following Surgery for Esophagogastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Review
- Beyond Mortality: Textbook Outcome as a Novel Quality Metric in Cardiothoracic Surgical Care.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Benchmarking cancer outcomes in Europe: a scoping review of methodologies and case-mix adjustments.ESMO real world data and digital oncology · 2025Review
- Textbook outcomes in the laparoscopic common bile duct exploration of choledocholithiasis: a new comprehensive quality evaluation criterion.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
- High comprehensive complication index after minimally invasive esophagectomy associated with poor short-term and long-term outcome: a propensity score matching analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Textbook outcome contributes to long-term prognosis in elderly patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2024Article
- MFI-11 in Chinese elderly esophageal cancer patients with postoperative adverse outcomes.BMC geriatrics · 2024Article
- High flow nasal oxygenJournal of thoracic disease · 2024Article
- Observational
- Impact of minimally invasive total mesoesophageal excision and minimally invasive esophagectomy on failure patterns of locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a matched cohort study with long-term follow-up.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Article
- The pre- and postoperative nomograms to predict the textbook outcomes of patients who underwent hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Textbook Outcome After Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: The textbook outcome (TO) emerges as a novel prognostic factor in surgical oncology. The present study aimed to evaluate the effect of TO on the risk of death and recurrence in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) after minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE). Methods: The study involved retrospective analysis of 528 patients with ESCC who were subjected to MIE from January 2011 to December 2017. TO included 8 parameters: complete resection; microscopically tumor-negative resection margins (R0); ≥15 lymph nodes removed and examined; no serious postoperative complications; no postoperative intervention; no re-admission to the intensive care unit (ICU); hospital stay ≤21 days; and no readmission ≤30 days. The Cox and logistic regression model were used to analyze the prognostic factors of survival and risk factors for TO. Results: Among the 528 patients with ESCC who were subjected to MIE, 53.2% reached TO. In the case of patients with locally advanced ESCC, 5-year overall survival (OS) was 51.1% (41.2-61.2%) for the TO group but 33.7% (23.7-43.7%) for the non-TO group (HR =0.644, 95% CI: 0.449-0.924, P=0.015). Similarly, 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 47.6% (38.0-57.2%) for the TO group but 29.1% (20.1-38.1%) for the non-TO group (HR =0.671, 95% CI: 0.479-0.940, P=0.018). In addition, 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 62.9% (53.7-72.1%) for the TO group but 39.8% (29.4-50.2%) for the non-TO group (HR =0.606, 95% CI: 0.407-0.902, P=0.012). Multivariate logistic regression analysis further showed that age, American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score, intraoperative blood loss, and smoking status acted as independent risk factors for TO. The results of the multivariate analysis assisted in the establishment of a nomogram for the prediction of TO occurrence. This nomogram exhibited satisfactory consistency and prediction ability [area under the receiving operator characteristic (AUROC) =0.717]. Conclusions: The present study showed that achieving of TO after MIE improves survival rate and reduce the recurrence rate in patients with locally advanced ESCC. The study further determined the independent factors associated with TO achievement and established a prediction model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.