Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35280392›Full record

ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2022

Effect of IFN-α and other commonly used nebulization drugs in different nebulization methods on the resistance of breathing circuit filters under invasive mechanical ventilation.

Zhenjie Jiang, Hanwen Liang, Guixia Peng, Shiya Wang, Baozhu Zhang, Qingwen Sun, Yuanda Xu, Huiqing Zeng, Jingye Huang

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Zhenjie Jiang *Department of Critical Care Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Hanwen Liang *Guangzhou Respiratory Health Research Institute, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Guixia Peng *Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Meizhou People's Hospital, Meizhou, China.
Shiya WangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Baozhu ZhangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Qingwen SunDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yuanda XuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Huiqing ZengDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Jingye HuangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University · CNGuangzhou Medical University · CNMeizhou City People's Hospital · CNZhongshan Hospital of Xiamen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Interferon (IFN) is widely used in clinical practice and nebulization inhalation is one of the commonly used routes of administration. However, nebulization drugs such as interferon-α (IFN-α) with large molecular weights may deposit in the membrane of the breathing filters, causing its resistance to gradually increase. Thus, our study explores the effect of IFN-α and other nebulization drugs on the resistance of breathing circuit filters under invasive mechanical ventilation. Methods: We divided 96 breathing filters into eight groups. The baseline group was not treated while the blank group was installed but were not nebulized. The remaining groups received jet nebulized or vibrating nebulized with either normal saline, Combivent, Amphotericin B, or IFN-α at a frequency of once every 12 hours separately and were removed from the breathing circuit after 24 hours. The resistance of the filter of each group was then measured and statistical comparisons were made. Results: Filter resistance of the IFN-α jet nebulization group was greater than that of the other groups, and there were statistical differences except for the Amphotericin B jet nebulization group. Comparison of the resistance [cmH Conclusions: Jet nebulization with IFN-α significantly increased the resistance of the breathing filter within 24 hours and there was no significant difference in filter resistance between jet nebulization and vibrating mesh nebulization of IFN-α or Amphotericin B.

Indexed as

Breathing circuit filtersinterferon-α (IFN-α)jet nebulizationvibrating mesh nebulization

Identifiers

PMID35280392
PMCPMC8908147
OpenAlexW4214702305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.