ArticleTranslational lung cancer research2022
Circulating tumor DNA predicts neoadjuvant immunotherapy efficacy and recurrence-free survival in surgical non-small cell lung cancer patients.
Article in Translational lung cancer research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
60 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 100 citations in OpenAlex.
- The prognostic role of circulating DNA markers in patients with lung malignancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Biomarkers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Prognostic value of preoperative circulating tumor DNA in non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2024Pooled it
- Prognostic value of circulating tumor DNA in operable non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and reconstructed individual patient-data based meta-analysis.BMC medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Association of ctDNA detection and recurrence assessment in patients with neoadjuvant treatment.Cancer medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Clinical significance of circulating tumor DNA in localized non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Accuracy of minimal residual disease detection by circulating tumor DNA profiling in lung cancer: a meta-analysis.BMC medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Efficacy, safety, and survival of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy in operable non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Pooled it
- Potential clinical utility of liquid biopsy in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer.BMC medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Depletion of Effector Regulatory T Cells Associates with Major Response to Induction Dual Immune Checkpoint Blockade.Cancer discovery · 2025Trial
- Long-Term Efficacy of Pembrolizumab and the Clinical Utility of ctDNA in Locally Advanced dMMR/MSI-H Solid Tumors.Nature communications · 2025Trial
- Neoadjuvant atezolizumab + chemotherapy for resectable NSCLC: 3-year clinical update of phase II clinical trial results and translational findings.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2024Trial
- Trial
- Towards liquid biopsy-based analysis of antitumour immunity.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026Review
- [Clinical Frontiers and Applications Progress of ctDNA in Precision Treatment of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2026Review
- Perioperative camrelizumab plus rivoceranib in resectable hepatocellular carcinoma: translating CARES-009 outcomes into a new therapeutic paradigm.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- [Research Advances in ctDNA-MRD Monitoring in Local Treatment for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2026Review
- Liquid biopsies for detection, characterization, and interception of therapy resistance in thoracic malignancies.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Integration of Nanotechnology with ctDNA: New Advances for Monitoring Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Circulating tumor DNA in neoadjuvant therapy for solid tumors.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- ctDNA and immune biomarker testing for molecular residual disease surveillance and immune stratification in cancer.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: There is currently a lack of effective biomarkers to evaluate efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) for resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has been investigated as a non-invasive tool for the assessment of tumor burden and minimal residual disease (MRD). The utility of ctDNA profiling in reflecting NAT efficacy, however, has not been confirmed. This study explored the association of ctDNA change with treatment response to NAT and recurrence-free survival (RFS) after surgery. Methods: Eligible patients with stage IB-IIIA NSCLC were retrospectively included if they had received neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy (IO+Chemo), dual immunotherapy (IO+IO), or chemotherapy alone (Chemo). We conducted ctDNA profiling before and after NAT, after surgery, and during follow-ups using an ultra-deep lung cancer-specific MRD (LC-MRD) sequencing panel. Results: A total of 22 patients who received NAT followed by surgery between August 2018 and July 2019 were included in this study. The major pathological response (MPR) rates were 58.33% (7/12) in the IO+Chemo group, 25.00% (1/4) in the IO+IO group, and 16.67% (1/6) in the Chemo group. The ctDNA dynamics during NAT were highly concordant with pathologic response, demonstrating 100% sensitivity and 83.33% specificity, for an overall accuracy of 91.67%. Pre-surgery detectable ctDNA (after NAT) trended to correlate with inferior RFS [hazard ratio (HR), 7.41; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.91-60.22, log-rank P=0.03]. At 3-8 days after surgery, ctDNA was detectable in 31.8% of patients and was an independent risk factor for recurrence (HR, 5.37; 95% CI: 1.27-22.67; log-rank P=0.01). The presence of ctDNA at 3 months after surgery showed 83% sensitivity and 90% specificity for predicting relapse (C-index, 0.79; 95% CI: 0.62-0.95). During disease monitoring after surgery, molecular recurrence by means of ctDNA preceded radiographic relapse, with a median time of 6.83 months. Conclusions: This study investigated the potential of ctDNA in evaluating NAT efficacy in NSCLC, implying the high concordance between ctDNA and pathological response. We also set out the prognostic value of perioperative ctDNA in predicting recurrence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.