Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35280310›Full record

ArticleTranslational lung cancer research2022

Prediction of future imagery of lung nodule as growth modeling with follow-up computed tomography scans using deep learning: a retrospective cohort study.

Guangyu Tao, Li Zhu, Qunhui Chen, Lekang Yin, Yamin Li, Jiancheng Yang, Bingbing Ni, Zheng Zhang, Chi Wan Koo, Pradnya D Patil and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational lung cancer research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Guangyu Tao *Department of Radiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Li Zhu *Department of Radiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Qunhui Chen *Department of Radiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Lekang YinDepartment of Radiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Yamin LiShanghai Key Lab of Digital Media Processing and Transmission, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Jiancheng YangDepartment of Electronic Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Bingbing NiDepartment of Electronic Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Zheng ZhangSchool of Biological Science & Medical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
Chi Wan KooDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Pradnya D PatilHematology and Medical Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Yinan ChenDepartment of Radiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Hong YuDepartment of Radiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Yi XuShanghai Key Lab of Digital Media Processing and Transmission, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Xiaodan YeDepartment of Radiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Risk prediction models of lung nodules have been built to alleviate the heavy interpretative burden on clinicians. However, the malignancy scores output by those models can be difficult to interpret in a clinically meaningful manner. In contrast, the modeling of lung nodule growth may be more readily useful. This study developed a CT-based visual forecasting system that can visualize and quantify a nodule in three dimensions (3D) in any future time point using follow-up CT scans. Methods: We retrospectively included 246 patients with 313 lung nodules with at least 1 follow-up CT scan. For the manually segmented nodules, we calculated geometric properties including CT value, diameter, volume, and mass, as well as growth properties including volume doubling time (VDT), and consolidation-to-tumor ratio (CTR) at follow-ups. These nodules were divided into growth and non-growth groups by thresholding their VDTs. We then developed a convolutional neural network (CNN) to model the imagery change of the nodules from baseline CT image (combined with the nodule mask) to follow-up CT image with a particular time interval. The model was evaluated on the geometric and radiological properties using either logistic regression or receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Results: The lung nodules consisted of 115 ground glass nodules (GGN) and 198 solid nodules and were followed up for an average of 354 days with 2 to 11 scans. The 2 groups differed significantly in most properties. The prediction of our forecasting system was highly correlated with the ground truth with small relative errors regarding the four geometric properties. The prediction-derived VDTs had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.857 and 0.843 in differentiating growth and non-growth nodules for GGN and solid nodules, respectively. The prediction-derived CTRs had an AUC of 0.892 in classifying high- and low-risk nodules. Conclusions: This proof-of-concept study demonstrated that the deep learning-based model can accurately forecast the imagery of a nodule in a given future for both GGNs and solid nodules and is worthy of further investigation. With a larger dataset and more validation, such a system has the potential to become a prognostication tool for assessing lung nodules.

Indexed as

deep learningfollow-upgrowth pattern predictionLung nodule

Identifiers

PMID35280310
PMCPMC8902095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.