Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35280302›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2022

Diagnostic Impact of Monitoring Visual Evoked Potentials to Prevent Visual Complications During Endovascular Treatment for Intracranial Aneurysm.

Ichiro Nakagawa, HunSoo Park, Masashi Kotsugi, Shohei Yokoyama, Kouji Omoto, Kaoru Myochin, Yasuhiro Takeshima, Ryosuke Matsuda, Fumihiko Nishimura, Shuichi Yamada and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ichiro NakagawaDepartments of Neurosurgery, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Japan.
HunSoo ParkDepartments of Neurosurgery, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Japan.
Masashi KotsugiDepartments of Neurosurgery, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Japan.
Shohei YokoyamaDepartments of Neurosurgery, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Japan.
Kouji OmotoDepartments of Neurosurgery, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Japan.
Kaoru MyochinDepartments of Radiology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Japan.
Yasuhiro TakeshimaDepartments of Neurosurgery, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Japan.
Ryosuke MatsudaDepartments of Neurosurgery, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Japan.
Fumihiko NishimuraDepartments of Neurosurgery, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Japan.
Shuichi YamadaDepartments of Neurosurgery, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Japan.
Tsunenori TakataniDivision of Central Clinical Laboratory, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Japan.
Hiroyuki NakaseDepartments of Neurosurgery, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Japan.
Nara Medical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The present study aimed to determine the incidence of intraprocedural visual-evoked potential (VEP) changes and to identify correlations with intraprocedural ischemic complications during endovascular treatment in patients with intracranial aneurysm related to visual function. Methods: This study analyzed data from 104 consecutive patients who underwent endovascular coil embolization to treat intracranial aneurysms related to visual function under VEP and transcranial motor evoked potential (MEP) monitoring. We analyzed associations between significant changes in MEP and VEP, defined as a >50% decrease in amplitude, and both intraprocedural complications and postoperative neurological deficits. Factors associated with postoperative neurological deficits were also assessed. Results: Treated aneurysms were predominantly located in the internal carotid artery (95%). Five (5%) were located in the posterior cerebral artery (PCA). Significant decreases in intraprocedural VEP occurred in four patients (4%), although one of those four patients did not show concomitant MEP decreases during procedures. Immediate salvage procedures avoided postoperative visual disturbances. All VEP decreases were transient and not associated with postoperative visual impairment. One of three cases who underwent intraoperative balloon occlusion test showed tolerance to balloon occlusion of the proximal PCA under VEP assessment; parent artery occlusion was performed without postoperative visual disturbance in that case. Conclusion: Although significant VEP decreases occurred 4% during neuro-endovascular aneurysm treatment related to visual function, intraprocedural VEP monitoring identifies ischemic changes associated with visual pathways and facilitates prompt initiation of salvage procedures.

Indexed as

coil embolizationcomplicationsintracranial aneurysmvisual disturbancevisual evoked potential monitoring

Identifiers

PMID35280302
PMCPMC8904750
OpenAlexW4214725212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.