Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35280216›Full record

ArticleHuman reproduction open2022

Women's reproductive span: a systematic scoping review.

A F Nabhan, G Mburu, F Elshafeey, R Magdi, M Kamel, M Elshebiny, Y G Abuelnaga, M Ghonim, M H Abdelhamid, Mo Ghonim and 18 more

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Human reproduction open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors.

A F NabhanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4572-2210
G MburuThe UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP Research), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
F ElshafeeyEgyptian Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6904-2901
R MagdiEgyptian Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Cairo, Egypt.
M KamelEgyptian Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4851-193X
M ElshebinyEgyptian Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4341-7450
Y G AbuelnagaEgyptian Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2675-5474
M GhonimEgyptian Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4399-9876
M H AbdelhamidEgyptian Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1568-9619
Mo GhonimEgyptian Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1129-8821
P EidEgyptian Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0266-2396
A MorsyEgyptian Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4011-6839
M NasserEgyptian Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3926-8410
N AbdelwahabEgyptian Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2311-0937
F ElhayatmyEgyptian Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2909-7489
A A HusseinEgyptian Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6555-001X
N ElgabalyEgyptian Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Cairo, Egypt.
E SawiresEgyptian Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8399-2364
Y TarkhanEgyptian Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Cairo, Egypt.
Y DoasEgyptian Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5741-3784
N FarragEgyptian Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6515-5933
A AmirEgyptian Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Cairo, Egypt.
M F GobranEgyptian Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4134-6484
M MagedEgyptian Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7124-8538
M AbdulhadyEgyptian Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6896-2711
Y SherifEgyptian Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4864-9357
M DyabEgyptian Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0849-698X
J KiarieThe UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP Research), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

study questionWhat is the scope of literature regarding women's reproductive span in terms of definitions, trends and determinants? SUMMARY ANSWER: The scoping review found a wide variation in definitions, trends and determinants of biological, social and effective women's reproductive span. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: A woman's reproductive span refers to her childbearing years. Its span influences a woman's reproductive decisions. STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION: A systematic scoping review was conducted. We searched MEDLINE, PubMed, JSTOR, CINAHL, Web of Science and Scopus electronic databases from inception to January 2021 without imposing language or date restrictions. We searched unpublished sources including the Global Burden of Disease, Demographic and Health Surveys, and National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys. The list of relevant references was searched by hand. Sixty-seven reports on women's reproductive span were included in this review. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING

methodsThis scoping systematic review followed an established framework. The reporting of this scoping review followed the reporting requirements provided in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, Extension for Scoping Reviews. Identified records were independently screened and data were extracted. We performed conceptual synthesis by grouping the studies by available concepts of reproductive span and then summarized definitions, measures used, temporal trends, determinants, and broad findings of implications on population demographics and assisted reproduction. Structured tabulation and graphical synthesis were used to show patterns in the data and convey detailed information efficiently, along with a narrative commentary. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: A total of 67 relevant reports on women's reproductive span were published between 1980 and 2020 from 74 countries. Most reports (42/67) were cross-sectional in design. Literature on reproductive span was conceptually grouped as biological (the interval between age at menarche and age at menopause), effective (when a woman is both fertile and engaging in sexual activity) and social (period of exposure to sexual activity). We summarized the working definitions, trends and determinants of each concept. Few articles addressed implications on demographics and assisted reproduction. LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: A formal assessment of methodological quality of the included studies was not performed because the aim of this review was to provide an overview of the existing evidence base regardless of quality. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE

findingsThe review produced a comprehensive set of possible definitions of women's reproductive span, trends, and potential determinants. Further advancement of these findings will involve collaboration with relevant stakeholders to rate the importance of each definition in relation to demography and fertility care, outline a set of core definitions, identify implications for policy, practice or research and define future research opportunities to explore linkages between reproductive spans, their determinants, and the need for assisted reproduction. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: This work received funding from the UNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), a cosponsored programme executed by the World Health Organization (WHO). The authors had no competing interests. STUDY REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Indexed as

assisted reproductiondemographyfemalehumansinfertilitymenarchemenopausereproductive span

Identifiers

PMID35280216
PMCPMC8907405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.