ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2022
Finding Effective and Efficient Ways to Integrate Research Advances Into the Clinical Suicide Risk Assessment Interview.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preparing an Intervention to Increase Engagement with the 988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline Resource among Community Mental Health Consumers with Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders.Community mental health journal · 2026Article
- Suicide risk and REDCap: facilitating clinical trial inclusion.BMC psychiatry · 2026Article
- Implementing a suicide risk management protocol as part of a multisite clinical trial: Findings and lessons learned.Clinical trials (London, England) · 2026Article
- Development and implementation of a self-directed violence prevention training program for correctional behavioral health providers: a clinical trial study protocol.Pilot and feasibility studies · 2024Article
- A Standard Protocol for the Clinical Management of Suicidal Thoughts and Behavior: Implications for the Suicide Prevention Narrative.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Review
- College students' screening early warning factors in identification of suicide risk.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Development and validation study of the suicide screening questionnaire-observer rating (SSQ-OR).Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Article
- Factors of suicidal behavior among inpatients with major depressive disorder: A retrospective case series.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Article
- Talking really does matter: Lay perspectives from older people on talking about suicide in later life.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Research in clinical suicidology continues to rapidly expand, much of it with implications for day-to-day clinical practice. Clinicians routinely wrestle with how best to integrate recent advances into practice and how to do so in efficient and effective fashion. This article identifies five critical domains of recent research findings and offers examples of simple questions that can easily be integrated into a clinician's existing suicide risk assessment interview and related protocol helping inform the risk formulation process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.