Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35280155›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2022

Character Strengths Across Disabilities: An International Exploratory Study and Implications for Positive Psychiatry and Psychology.

Emre Umucu, Beatrice Lee, Helen M Genova, William J Chopik, Connie Sung, Mizuka Yasuoka, Ryan M Niemiec

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Emre UmucuDepartment of Counseling, Educational Psychology, and Special Education, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States.
Beatrice LeeDepartment of Counseling, Educational Psychology, and Special Education, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States.
Helen M GenovaCenter for Neuropsychology and Neuroscience Research, Kessler Foundation, West Orange, NJ, United States.
William J ChopikDepartment of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States.
Connie SungDepartment of Counseling, Educational Psychology, and Special Education, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States.
Mizuka YasuokaDepartment of Counseling, Educational Psychology, and Special Education, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States.
Ryan M NiemiecEducation Director of the VIA Institute, VIA Institute on Character, Cincinnati, OH, United States.

Funding

A Strength-Based Intervention to Improve Job Interview Skills in Transition Age Youth with ASDK18MH122847 · NIMH · KESSLER FOUNDATION, INC. · PI GENOVA, HELEN M · 2021 to 2022
$267k
NIMH NIH HHS K18 MH122847
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the differences in character strengths for people with disabilities by using an international dataset by the VIA Institiute on Character. Specifically, we aimed to explore (a) the top and bottom five character strengths reported by different disability groups and all people with disabilities more broadly, and (b) group differences in each character strength and total character strengths. The investigator contacted the VIA Institute on Character (http://www.viacharacter.org/) for obtaining the dataset for the current study. After data cleaning, our sample size resulted in 11,699 people with disabilities. Among most people with disabilities, the top five character strengths scores were love of learning, honesty, appreciation of beauty and excellence, kindness, and fairness. The bottom five character strengths scores were self-regulation, perseverance, zest, spirituality, and prudence. Knowing that there is heterogeneity in character strengths across groups gives us a better understanding of the areas that people with different disabilities and conditions might thrive and provides clinicians and practitioners with a more nuanced understanding for how to possibly intervene with their clients. Positive psychiatry and psychology implications are discussed.

Indexed as

chronic conditiondisabilityemotional disabilitiespositive psychiatrypositive psychology

Identifiers

PMID35280155
PMCPMC8914428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.