ArticleSurgery open science2022
Risk factors for lower extremity lymphedema after inguinal lymphadenectomy in melanoma patients: A retrospective cohort study.
Article in Surgery open science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Lymphatic vessel network injury reduces local tumor control despite preservation of the tumor-draining lymph node.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Cancer-Related Lymphedema and Psychological Distress.Current psychiatry reports · 2024Review
- Review of treatment strategies after lymphadenectomy: From molecular therapeutics to immediate microsurgical lymphatic reconstruction.Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders · 2024Review
- Etiology and treatment of cancer-related secondary lymphedema.Clinical & experimental metastasis · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The aim of lymph node dissection for melanoma patients is to prevent metastasis. However, this procedure is accompanied by a long-term and impaired life-quality complication called Materials and Methods: We identified 136 inguinal lymphadenectomy melanoma patients treated between January 2010 and January 2021. The patients' demographic, clinical, and pathological data and postoperative outcomes were collected by electronic medical record review and patient follow-up. The patients' postoperative outcomes were defined as lower extremity swelling and lower extremity lymphedema. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine the independent predictors of lower extremity lymphedema. Results: The follow-up results from 85 melanoma patients who underwent inguinal lymphadenectomy were analyzed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that number of lymph nodes removed ≥ 10 was the significant risk factor for postoperative lower extremity lymphedema (odds ratio = 6.468, P = .042, 95% confidence interval: 1.069 to 39.147). Moreover, 8 (100%) patients in the lower extremity lymphedema group and 32 (53.3%) patients in the normal group were female, which indicated that female patients might be more susceptible to postoperative lower extremity lymphedema (P = .012). Conclusion: Our study found that number of inguinal lymph nodes removed ≥ 10 was associated with a significantly higher incidence of lower extremity lymphedema with a 6.5-fold increased risk in melanoma patients. Also, female patients were more likely to develop lower extremity lymphedema after inguinal lymphadenectomy.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.