ArticleSurgery open science2022
Prediction of hospital mortality after colorectal perforation surgery from inflammation-based prognostic scores.
Article in Surgery open science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Novel prognostic score for colorectal necrosis requiring emergency surgery.Surgery today · 2025Article
- Combination of radiomic and clinical characteristics to predict mortality in patients with colorectal perforation.International journal of colorectal disease · 2025Article
- Risk Factors of Postoperative Complication and Hospital Mortality after Colorectal Perforation Surgery.Journal of the anus, rectum and colon · 2024Article
- C-reactive Protein/Albumin Ratio Predicts Short-term Postoperative Outcomes and Intraabdominal Abscess Formation in Colorectal Perforation.Journal of the anus, rectum and colon · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Inflammation-based prognostic scores have prognostic value in cancer or cardiovascular disease patients. This study evaluated the prognostic value of inflammation-based prognostic scores in colorectal perforation patients. Methods: Data of 97 patients who underwent surgery for colorectal perforation were reviewed. We calculated various inflammation-based prognostic scores and analyzed the relationship between inflammation-based prognostic score and hospital mortality due to colorectal perforation. Results: Multivariate analyses of hospital mortality revealed neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (P = .0021), C-reactive protein/albumin ratio (P = .0224), and prognostic nutritional index (P = .0078) as independent predictive factors. The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that patients who met all of the following parameters avoided hospital death: neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio < 30, prognostic nutritional index ≥ 27.2, age < 75 years, and perforation of the left colon. Conclusion: Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, C-reactive protein/albumin ratio, and prognostic nutritional index were superior to other inflammation-based prognostic scores in predicting mortality of colorectal perforation. Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, prognostic nutritional index, patient's age, and sidedness of the perforation site may be useful parameters to identify subgroups in which a favorable prognosis can be expected.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.