Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35279934›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of mental health nursing2022

Protocol for a mixed methods process evaluation of the Promoting Resilience in Nurses (PRiN) trial.

Minh Viet Bui, Elizabeth McInnes, Gary Ennis, Kim Foster

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of mental health nursing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A concept analysis of vicarious resilience in mental health nursing.International journal of nursing sciences · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Minh Viet BuiSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, Australian Catholic University, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9346-3332
Elizabeth McInnesSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, Australian Catholic University, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0567-9679
Gary EnnisNorthWestern Mental Health, Melbourne Health, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4215-4748
Kim FosterSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, Australian Catholic University, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6931-2422
Melbourne Health · AUSt Vincent's Hospital Melbourne · AU

Funding

Australian Catholic UniversityAustralian Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mental health nurses are exposed frequently to occupational stress and can experience a range of negative impacts on their well-being and intention to stay in the nursing workforce. Promoting Resilience in Nurses (PRiN) is a strength-based resilience education programme that incorporates evidence-based cognitive behavioural and interpersonal approaches with post-traumatic growth theory. A partially clustered randomized controlled trial at a large public mental health service will be used to examine the effects of PRiN on mental health nurses' coping self-efficacy, resilience, well-being, mental health, emotional regulation, post-traumatic growth, workplace belonging, and turnover intention as compared to controls. Process evaluations are increasingly used to help understand and interpret trial results for complex interventions. This paper describes the protocol for an embedded mixed methods process evaluation that aims to evaluate the PRiN programme implementation and identify factors that may explain variation in participant outcomes in the trial. Data collection includes a programme participant satisfaction survey; a follow-up semi-structured interview with selected programme participants; a unit/team manager survey on barriers and facilitators to staff recruitment and programme participation; and a fidelity checklist completed by programme facilitators. Normalisation Process Theory will be used to inform data analysis and integration. The findings will provide insights into factors that affect programme implementation, particularly in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and may help explain differences in participant outcomes. Findings will also inform post-trial programme sustainability as well as potential future upscale and adaptation for implementation across healthcare settings.

Indexed as

COVID-19Occupational StressHumansMental HealthPandemicsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicWorkplaceCOVID-19 pandemicmental health nursingprocess evaluationrandomized controlled trialresilience programme

Identifiers

PMID35279934
PMCPMC9314145
OpenAlexW4220856980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.