Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35279810›Full record

ArticleAdvances in therapy2022

Environmental Sustainability in Respiratory Care: An Overview of the healthCARe-Based envirONmental Cost of Treatment (CARBON) Programme.

Alex Wilkinson, Ekaterina Maslova, Christer Janson, Yang Xu, John Haughney, Jennifer K Quint, Nigel Budgen, Andrew Menzies-Gow, John Bell, Michael G Crooks

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. The Impact of Climate Change on Respiratory Care: A Scoping Review.The journal of climate change and health · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Alex WilkinsonRespiratory Department, Lister Hospital, East and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust, Coreys Mill Lane, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 4AB, UK. alex.wilkinson2@nhs.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1808-3663
Ekaterina MaslovaAstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
Christer JansonDepartment of Medical Sciences, Respiratory, Allergy and Sleep Research, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Yang XuAstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
John HaughneyQueen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK.
Jennifer K QuintNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Nigel BudgenAstraZeneca, Macclesfield, UK.
Andrew Menzies-GowRoyal Brompton Hospital, London, UK.
John BellAstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
Michael G CrooksHull York Medical School, Hull, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFaced with the challenges of climate change, countries are seeking to decarbonise their economies. A greater understanding of what comprises the carbon footprint of care in healthcare systems will identify potential strategies for reduction of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. In respiratory care, the focus has been on preventer inhalers, thereby omitting contributions from other aspects such as healthcare resource utilisation (HCRU) and reliever inhaler use. The healthCARe-Based envirONmental cost of treatment (CARBON) programme aims to provide a broader understanding of the carbon footprint associated with respiratory care.

methodsCARBON will quantify the carbon footprint of medications and HCRU among approximately 2.5 million patients with respiratory diseases from seven ongoing studies spanning more than 40 countries. Across studies, to obtain the carbon footprint of all inhaled, oral, and injectable medications, SimaPro life cycle assessment software modelling resource and energy consumption data, in addition to Ecoinvent PLANNED OUTCOMES: In asthma, CARBON studies will quantify GHG emissions associated with well-controlled versus not well-controlled asthma, the contribution of short-acting β

conclusionCARBON aims to show that the principle of evidence-led care focused on improvement of clinical outcomes has the potential to benefit patients and the environment.

Indexed as

AsthmaPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveCarbon FootprintDelivery of Health CareHumansNebulizers and VaporizersAsthmaCarbon footprintCOPDGreenhouse gas emissions

Identifiers

PMID35279810
PMCPMC9056443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.