ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2022
Association of aortic distensibility and left ventricular function in patients with stenotic bicuspid aortic valve and preserved ejection fraction: a CMR study.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Backward Aortic Flow Is Associated with Impaired Left Ventricular Mechanics in Young Adults with Bicuspid Aortic Valve: A Prospective Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Left ventricular myocardial work for the prediction of postoperative outcomes in patients with bicuspid aortic stenosis.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
To determine the relationship between aortic distensibility and left ventricular (LV) remodeling, myocardial strain and blood biomarkers in patients with stenotic bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) and preserved ejection fraction (EF) by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). 43 stenotic BAV patients were prospectively selected for 3.0 T CMR. Patients were divided into LV remodeling group (LV mass/volume ≥ 1.15, n = 21) and non-remodeling group (LV mass/volume < 1.15, n = 22). Clinical characteristics, biochemical data including cardiac troponin T(cTNT), N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and creatine kinase isoenzyme (CK-MB) were noted. Distensibility of middle ascending aorta (mid-AA) and proximal descending aorta, LV structural and functional parameters, global and regional myocardial strain were measured. Compared to non-remodeling group, LV remodeling group had significantly decreased LV global strain (radial: 26.04 ± 8.70% vs. 32.92 ± 7.81%, P = 0.009; circumferential: - 17.20 ± 3.38% vs. - 19.65 ± 2.34%, P = 0.008; longitudinal: - 9.13 ± 2.34% vs. - 11.63 ± 1.99%, P < 0.001) and decreased mid-AA distensibility (1.22 ± 0.24 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.