ArticleBioprocess and biosystems engineering2022
Prokaryotic and eukaryotic promoters identification based on residual network transfer learning.
Article in Bioprocess and biosystems engineering, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating yeast biodiversity and machine learning for predictive metabolic engineering.FEMS yeast research · 2025Review
- Natural promoters and promoter engineering strategies for metabolic regulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Promoters contribute to research in the context of many diseases, such as coronary heart disease, diabetes and tumors, and one fundamental task is to identify promoters. Deep learning is widely used in the study of promoter sequence recognition. Although deep models have fast and accurate recognition capabilities, they are also limited by their reliance on large amounts of high-quality data. Therefore, we performed transfer learning on a typical deep network based on residual ideas, called a deep residual network (ResNet), to solve the problem of a deep network's high dependence on large amounts of data in the process of promoter prediction. We used binary one-hot encoding to represent the promoter and took advantage of ResNet to extract feature representations from organisms with a large amount of promoter data. Then, we transferred the learned structural parameters to target organisms with insufficient promoter data to improve the generalization performance of ResNet in target organisms. We evaluated the promoter datasets of four organisms (Bacillus subtilis, Escherichia coli, Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Drosophila melanogaster). The experimental results showed that the AUCs of ResNet's promoter prediction after deep transfer were 0.8537 and 0.8633, which increased by 0.1513 and 0.1376 in prokaryotes and eukaryotes, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35279747What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.