Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35279746›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of colorectal disease2022

Does a long interval between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery benefit the clinical outcomes of locally advanced rectal cancer? A systematic review and meta analyses.

Miao Yu, Deng-Chao Wang, Sheng Li, Li-Yan Huang, Jian Wei

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of colorectal disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Watch and Wait Approach for Rectal Cancer.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Miao YuDepartment of Basic Medicine, Sichuan Vocational College of Health and Rehabilitation, Zigong, Sichuan, China.
Deng-Chao WangDepartment of General Surgery, Zigong Fourth People's Hospital, Zigong, Sichuan, China. wangdengchaopwk@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1120-4319
Sheng LiDepartment of Basic Medicine, Sichuan Vocational College of Health and Rehabilitation, Zigong, Sichuan, China.
Li-Yan HuangDepartment of Pathology, West China Second Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Jian WeiDepartment of General Surgery, Zigong Fourth People's Hospital, Zigong, Sichuan, China.
Second Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese · CNZigong First People's Hospital · CNSichuan University · CN

Funding

Scientific research project of Sichuan Vocational College of Health and Rehabilitation CWKY-2020Y-04
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe study aims to systematically evaluate the clinical efficacy after 8 weeks (long interval, LI) between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer.

methodsThe PubMed database, EMBASE database, and the Cochrane Library (deadline: September 25, 2021) were searched to select clinical studies that compared two intervals between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer: after 8 weeks (long interval, LI) and within 8 weeks (short interval, SI). The included studies were screened and evaluated according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and meta-analysis was performed by RevMan 5.3 software.

resultsEighteen studies were included, with 9070 cases in the LI group and 14,207 cases in the SI group. The analysis results showed that the pathologic complete response (PCR) rate in the LI group was higher than that in the SI group (P < 0.00001). There was no significant difference in the R0 resection rate (P = 0.85), anal preservation rate (P = 0.89), morbidity rate (P = 0.60), anastomotic leakage rate (P = 0.06), operation time (P = 0.58), local recurrence rate (P = 0.56), distant metastasis rate (P = 0.32), or overall survival (OS) rate (P = 0.17) between the two groups.

conclusionA longer interval between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery can improve the PCR rate; however, it has no significant impact on the clinical efficacy or long-term prognosis. Due to some limitations in the number and quality of the studies, these findings still need to be further verified by multicenter, large-sample high-quality RCTs in the future.

Indexed as

Neoadjuvant TherapyRectal NeoplasmsChemoradiotherapyHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicRectumTreatment OutcomeMeta-analysisNeoadjuvant chemoradiotherapyRectal cancerSurgery

Identifiers

PMID35279746
OpenAlexW4221113271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.