Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35279622›Full record

ArticleAddictive behaviors2022

Adverse childhood experiences and past 30-day cannabis use among middle and high school students: The protective influence of families and schools.

Kristen D Clements-Nolle, Taylor Lensch, Cara S Drake, Jennifer L Pearson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addictive behaviors, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The impact of recreational cannabis legalization on pediatric emergency department visits in British Columbia, Canada.Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kristen D Clements-NolleDivision of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, University of Nevada, Reno, United States. Electronic address: clements@unr.edu.
Taylor LenschDivision of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, University of Nevada, Reno, United States.
Cara S DrakeDivision of Social and Behavioral Health and Health Administration and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Nevada, Reno, United States.
Jennifer L PearsonDivision of Social and Behavioral Health and Health Administration and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Nevada, Reno, United States.

Funding

Recreational cannabis legalization in Nevada: a multi-method approach to evaluating changes in adolescent cannabis use and the influence of dispensary and outdoor advertising densityR15DA047606 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO · PI PEARSON, JENNIFER LYNN · 2019 to 2019
$424k
NIDA NIH HHS R15 DA047606
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exposure to adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) is a risk factor for adolescent cannabis use (CU). We explored whether family communication and school connectedness can offer direct protection (the compensatory model of resiliency) or moderating protection (the protective factors model of resiliency). Using cluster random sampling, a Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS) was conducted with 5,341 middle school and 4,980 high school students in 2019. Generalized estimating equations were used to estimate whether family communication and school connectedness offered independent direct protection (multiple regression) or moderating protection (multiplicative interaction) in the relationship between ACEs and past 30-day CU. Adjusted prevalence ratios (APR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated. There was a graded relationship between ACEs and past 30-day CU for all students that was particularly strong among middle school students: 1 ACE (APR = 2.37, 95% CI = 2.16, 2.62), 2 ACEs (APR = 2.89, 95% CI = 2.60, 3.23), 3 ACEs (APR = 5.30, 95% CI = 4.75, 5.90), 4 + ACEs (APR = 7.86, 95% CI = 7.13, 8.67). Results supported the compensatory model of resiliency with both family communication (middle school APR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.88, 0.93; high school APR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.87, 0.93) and school connectedness (middle school APR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.72, 0.79; high school APR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.68, 0.77) demonstrating a direct, independent protective relationship with past 30-day CU. There was no consistent evidence supporting the protective factors resiliency model.

Indexed as

Adverse Childhood ExperiencesCannabisAdolescentHumansRisk-TakingSchoolsStudentsAdolescentsAdverse childhood experiencesCannabisResiliency

Identifiers

PMID35279622
PMCPMC9223419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.