Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35279325›Full record

SynthesisJournal of the National Medical Association2022

Improving African American women's engagement in clinical research: A systematic review of barriers to participation in clinical trials.

Daisy Le, Hanna Ozbeki, Stefanie Salazar, Madison Berl, Monique Mitchell Turner, Olga Acosta Price

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of the National Medical Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Randomized Comparison of Online Motivational Themes in Clinical Trial Recruitment.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2025
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Daisy LeThe George Washington University, School of Nursing, 1919 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite 500, Washington DC, 20006 USA. Electronic address: daisyle@gwu.edu.
Hanna OzbekiThe George Washington University Milken Institute School of Public Health, 950 New Hampshire Avenue NW #2, Washington, DC 20052 USA. Electronic address: hozbeki@gwu.edu.
Stefanie SalazarThe George Washington University Computational Biology Institute, 22nd Street NW, SEH Office 7000, Washington DC, 20052 USA. Electronic address: salazar.projects21@gmail.com.
Madison BerlChildren's National Hospital, 111 Michigan Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20010 USA. Electronic address: mberl@childrensnational.org.
Monique Mitchell TurnerMichigan State University Department of Communication, 404 Wilson Road, Room 473B, East Lansing, MI, 48823 USA. Electronic address: mmturner@msu.edu.
Olga Acosta PriceThe George Washington University Milken Institute School of Public Health, 950 New Hampshire Avenue NW, Suite 300, Washington DC, 20037 USA. Electronic address: oaprice@gwu.edu.

Funding

Clinical and Translational Science Institute at Childrens NationalUL1TR001876 · NCATS · CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI BELL, MICHAEL J · 2016 to 2021
$25.6M
Clinical and Translational Science Institute at Children's NationalUL1TR000075 · NCATS · CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI GUAY-WOODFORD, LISA MARIE · 2012 to 2015
$13.7M
CTSA INFRASTRUCTURE FOR PEDIATRIC RESEARCHUL1RR031988 · NCRR · CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI GUAY-WOODFORD, LISA MARIE · 2010 to 2011
$8.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000075NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001876NCI NIH HHS L60 CA264786NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR031988
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite multiple efforts, African American women continue to be inadequately represented in clinical research while being overrepresented in disease, producing research results with limited generalizability to this specific population. Our understanding of the barriers to participation in clinical trials among racial/ethnic minority patients in general has evolved, but few studies have examined the reasoning behind African American women's decision to not participate in clinical trials.

objectiveThe primary aim was to conduct a systematic review to identify the barriers reported by African American women regarding participation in clinical research to help explain the low levels of enrollment. We also suggest strategies that can be implemented by the research community to lessen the effect of those barriers.

methodsSearches were conducted through MEDLINE, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. Following a set of eligibility criteria, a total of 18 peer-reviewed journal articles were selected and analyzed to render categories and themes.

resultsAcross studies aimed at examining their unique perspective, the reasons mentioned by African American women for not participating in clinical research were grouped in three broad categories: 1) weak relationship with the medical and research community, 2) high cost to participation, and 3) personal and "out-of-reach" circumstances. Reasons pertaining to participants' relationship with physicians/researchers were most salient. DISCUSSION: A targeted and comprehensive understanding of the barriers impacting African American women's decision to participate in clinical research informs population-specific recruitment and research strategies for future studies. Additional studies assessing barriers to clinical trial research participation that intentionally report on disaggregated data by not only race/ethnicity but also sex are essential to improving the risk/benefit profile for a wide range of prevention and treatment efforts. This improved understanding of the differences between subgroups within minority populations has implications for bolstering culturally sensitive messages to enhance the engagement of minority communities in clinical trial research.

Indexed as

Black or African AmericanEthnicityFemaleHumansMinority GroupsPatient SelectionResearch DesignAfrican American womenBarriersClinical trialsMinority womenRecruitment

Identifiers

PMID35279325
PMCPMC9189005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.