Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35279174›Full record

SynthesisWorld journal of surgical oncology2022

Comparison of the extraperitoneal and transperitoneal routes for permanent colostomy: a meta-analysis with RCTs and systematic review.

Jinlong Luo, Dujanand Singh, Faqiang Zhang, Xinting Yang, Xiaoying Zha, Huaiwu Jiang, Lie Yang, Hua Yang

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in World journal of surgical oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Prophylactic Mesh in Parastomal Hernia Prevention: Current Evidence.Journal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Development and preliminary evaluation of a novel procedure for creation of an ileal conduit stoma aimed at preventing parastomal hernia.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jinlong Luo *Department of Colorectal Anal Surgery, Zigong Fourth People's Hospital, Zigong, Sichuan, China.
Dujanand Singh *Laboratory of Digestive Surgery, West China Hospital and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Faqiang Zhang *Department of Colorectal Anal Surgery, Zigong Fourth People's Hospital, Zigong, Sichuan, China.
Xinting Yang *Department of Wound Care Center, West China Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Xiaoying Zha *Department of Wound Care Center, Department of Colorectal Anal Surgery, Zigong Fourth Hospital, Zigong, Sichuan, China.
Huaiwu Jiang *Department of General Surgery, Sichuan Mianyang 404 Hospital, Mianyang, Sichuan, China.
Lie YangLaboratory of Digestive Surgery, West China Hospital and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China. 276503229@qq.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0625-7611
Hua YangDepartment of Colorectal Anal Surgery, Zigong Fourth People's Hospital, Zigong, Sichuan, China. 19393148@qq.com.
Zigong First People's Hospital · CNSichuan University · CNSichuan Mianyang 404 Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo assess the efficacy of extraperitoneal colostomy (EPC) in preventing stoma-related complications.

backgroundTransperitoneal colostomy (TPC) is a widely used surgical approach. However, TPCs have been reported to have increased risks of stoma-related complications, such as parastomal hernias, stomal retraction, and stomal prolapse. The purpose of EPC is to reduce these complications. However, there is still a lack of evidence-based studies. MATERIALS AND

methodsMEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, MOOSE, PubMed, Google Scholar, Baidu Scholar, and the Cochrane Library were searched to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis with RCTs. The meta-analysis was performed with RevMan 5.4 software.

resultsThis study included 5 eligible RCTs. Compared with the TPC group, the EPC group had lower incidence rates of parastomal hernias (RR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.04-0.52, P = 0.003, I

conclusionExtraperitoneal colostomies are associated with lower rates of postoperative complications than transperitoneal colostomies. A randomized controlled trial meta-analysis found that permanent colostomies after abdominoperineal resection resulted in better outcomes.

Indexed as

ProctectomySurgical StomasColostomyHumansPostoperative ComplicationsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSoftwareColostomyComplicationExtraperitonealMeta-analysisParastomal herniaRCTTransperitoneal

Identifiers

PMID35279174
PMCPMC8918274
OpenAlexW4220967444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.