Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35279157›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2022

Clinician documentation of patient centered care in the electronic health record.

Jorie M Butler, Bryan Gibson, Olga V Patterson, Laura J Damschroder, Corrinne H Halls, Daniel W Denhalter, Matthew H Samore, Haojia Li, Yue Zhang, Scott L DuVall

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Clinical Notes Contain Limited Documentation of Shared Decision Making for Colorectal Cancer Screening Decisions.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2025
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jorie M ButlerVA Salt Lake City Health Care System, IDEAS Center of Innovation, George E. Whalen Department of Veterans Affairs Health Care System, 500 Foothill Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84148, USA. jorie.butler@hsc.utah.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-4519-7997
Bryan GibsonVA Salt Lake City Health Care System, IDEAS Center of Innovation, George E. Whalen Department of Veterans Affairs Health Care System, 500 Foothill Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84148, USA.
Olga V PattersonVA Salt Lake City Health Care System, IDEAS Center of Innovation, George E. Whalen Department of Veterans Affairs Health Care System, 500 Foothill Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84148, USA.
Laura J DamschroderAnn Arbor VA Center for Clinical Management Research, P.O. Box 130170, Ann Arbor, MI, 48113-0170, USA.
Corrinne H HallsVA Salt Lake City Health Care System, IDEAS Center of Innovation, George E. Whalen Department of Veterans Affairs Health Care System, 500 Foothill Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84148, USA.
Daniel W DenhalterVA Salt Lake City Health Care System, IDEAS Center of Innovation, George E. Whalen Department of Veterans Affairs Health Care System, 500 Foothill Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84148, USA.
Matthew H SamoreVA Salt Lake City Health Care System, IDEAS Center of Innovation, George E. Whalen Department of Veterans Affairs Health Care System, 500 Foothill Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84148, USA.
Haojia LiDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, 295 Chipeta Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA.
Yue ZhangVA Salt Lake City Health Care System, IDEAS Center of Innovation, George E. Whalen Department of Veterans Affairs Health Care System, 500 Foothill Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84148, USA.
Scott L DuVallVA Salt Lake City Health Care System, IDEAS Center of Innovation, George E. Whalen Department of Veterans Affairs Health Care System, 500 Foothill Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84148, USA.
University of Utah · USVA Center for Clinical Management Research · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn this study we sought to explore the possibility of using patient centered care (PCC) documentation as a measure of the delivery of PCC in a health system.

methodsWe first selected 6 VA medical centers based on their scores for a measure of support for self-management subscale from a national patient satisfaction survey (the Survey for Healthcare Experience-Patients). We accessed clinical notes related to either smoking cessation or weight management consults. We then annotated this dataset of notes for documentation of PCC concepts including: patient goals, provider support for goal progress, social context, shared decision making, mention of caregivers, and use of the patient's voice. We examined the association of documentation of PCC with patients' perception of support for self-management with regression analyses.

resultsTwo health centers had < 50 notes related to either tobacco cessation or weight management consults and were removed from further analysis. The resulting dataset includes 477 notes related to 311 patients total from 4 medical centers. For a majority of patients (201 out of 311; 64.8%) at least one PCC concept was present in their clinical notes. The most common PCC concepts documented were patient goals (patients n = 126; 63% clinical notes n = 302; 63%), patient voice (patients n = 165, 82%; clinical notes n = 323, 68%), social context (patients n = 105, 52%; clinical notes n = 181, 38%), and provider support for goal progress (patients n = 124, 62%; clinical notes n = 191, 40%). Documentation of goals for weight loss notes was greater at health centers with higher satisfaction scores compared to low. No such relationship was found for notes related to tobacco cessation.

conclusionProviders document PCC concepts in their clinical notes. In this pilot study we explored the feasibility of using this data as a means to measure the degree to which care in a health center is patient centered. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: clinical EHR notes are a rich source of information about PCC that could potentially be used to assess PCC over time and across systems with scalable technologies such as natural language processing.

Indexed as

DocumentationElectronic Health RecordsHumansPatient-Centered CarePatient SatisfactionPilot ProjectsContextual informationGoalsMedical record reviewPatient centered care

Identifiers

PMID35279157
PMCPMC8917709
OpenAlexW4220813106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.