ArticleBMC medical education2022
Cinemeducation in medicine: a mixed methods study on students' motivations and benefits.
Article in BMC medical education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating cinemeducation and entrepreneurship for experiential learning in public health.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Contemporary cinemeducation: Transdisciplinary exchange at Locarno Film Festival.GMS journal for medical education · 2026Article
- Every Word and Action: Using Cinemeducation to Enhance Medical Students' Awareness of and Upstander Responses to Disability Microaggressions.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2026Article
- Contemporary cinemeducation: Transdisciplinary exchange at Locarno Film Festival.GMS journal for medical education · 2026Article
- Cinemeducation: a descriptive mixed-methods analysis of perspectives in a medical humanities course.Medical education online · 2025Article
- Cinema as a pedagogical tool for empathy training in dental education: a qualitative study.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- The practical year: a qualitative study on stressors, resources and proposed improvements among medical students.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Healthcare student engagement with health-related content through Netflix mini-series: a qualitative study.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Patient safety education in undergraduate medical education through a global lens: a scoping review.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Enhancing Medical Student Engagement Through Cinematic Clinical Narratives: Multimodal Generative AI-Based Mixed Methods Study.JMIR medical education · 2025Article
- "Cinemeducation" as a teaching-learning tool in Community Medicine for Phase II MBBS students.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2024Article
- Cine Medicine in Indian Scenario: A SWOT Analysis.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social MedicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCinemeducation courses are used to supplement more standard teaching formats at medical schools and tend to emphasise biopsychosocial aspects of health. The purpose of this paper is to explore why medical students attend the cinemeducation course M23 Cinema (M23C) at LMU Munich and whether a film screening with a subsequent expert and peer discussion benefits their studies and their future careers as medical doctors.
methodsAn exploratory sequential mixed methods study design was used. Qualitative research, i.e. three focus groups, four expert interviews, one group interview and one narrative interview, was conducted to inform a subsequent quantitative survey. Qualitative data was analysed using qualitative content analysis and quantitative data was analysed descriptively. The findings were integrated using the "following a thread" protocol.
resultsIn total, 28 people were interviewed and 503 participants responded to the survey distributed at seven M23C screenings. Participants perceive the M23C as informal teaching where they learn about perspectives on certain health topics through the combination of film and discussion while spending time with peers. The reasons for and reported benefits of participation varied with educational background, participation frequency and gender. On average, participants gave 5.7 reasons for attending the M23C. The main reasons for participating were the film, the topic and the ability to discuss these afterwards as well as to spend an evening with peers. Attending the M23C was reported to support the students' memory with regards to certain topics addressed in the M23C when the issues resurface at a later stage, such as during university courses, in the hospital, or in their private life.
conclusionsThe M23C is characterised by its unique combination of film and discussion that encourages participants to reflect upon their opinions, perspectives and experiences. Participating in the M23C amplified the understanding of biopsychosocial aspects of health and illness in students. Thus, cinemeducative approaches such as the M23C may contribute to enabling health professionals to develop and apply humane, empathetic and relational skills.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.