Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35279153›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2022

Motivations, barriers, and professional engagement: a multisite qualitative study of internal medicine faculty's experiences learning and teaching point-of-care ultrasound.

Christopher J Smith, Keith Barron, Ronald J Shope, Elizabeth Beam, Kevin Piro

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. POCUS Oversight for All: A Pathway for Non-Expert Educators.Journal of Brown hospital medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher J SmithDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Hospital Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 986430 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA. csmithj@unmc.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6417-0824
Keith BarronPrisma Health Midlands - University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, 14 Richland Medical Park Drive, Suite, Columbia, SC, 320, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3033-9497
Ronald J ShopeDepartment of Health Promotion, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 984365 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2990-2740
Elizabeth BeamInterprofessional Academy of Educators, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 987115 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2969-2509
Kevin PiroDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Hospital Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, 3270 SW Pavilion Loop Suite, Portland, OR, 350, USA.
Nebraska Medical Center · USOregon Health & Science University · USPrisma Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPoint-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) graduate medical education is expanding across many specialties, but a lack of trained faculty is a common barrier. Even well-designed faculty development programs struggle with retention, yet little is known about the experiences of practicing physicians learning POCUS. Our objective is to explore the experiences of clinician-educators as they integrate POCUS into their clinical and teaching practices to help inform curriculum design.

methodsQualitative study using instrumental case study design to analyze interview data from 18 internal medicine clinician-educators at 3 academic health centers. Interviewees were recruited by program directors at each site to include participants with a range of POCUS use patterns. Interviews took place from July-August 2019.

resultsAnalysis yielded 6 themes: teaching performance, patient care, curriculum needs, workflow and access, administrative support, and professional engagement. Participants felt POCUS enhanced their teaching skills, clinical decision making, and engagement with patients. The themes highlighted the importance of longitudinal supervision and feedback, streamlined integration of POCUS into clinical workflow, and administrative support of time and resources. Interviewees reported learning and teaching POCUS helped combat burn-out and enhance their sense of professional engagement.

conclusionsLearning POCUS as a practicing clinician-educator is a complicated endeavor that must take into account mastery of psychomotor skills, existing practice habits, and local institutional concerns. Based upon the themes generated from this study, we make recommendations to help guide POCUS faculty development curriculum design. Although this study focused on internists, the findings are likely generalizable to other specialties with growing interest in POCUS education.

Indexed as

MotivationPoint-of-Care SystemsFacultyHumansInternal MedicineUltrasonographyCurriculum designFaculty developmentPoint-of-care ultrasound (POCUS)Qualitative research

Identifiers

PMID35279153
PMCPMC8918294
OpenAlexW4221014232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.