Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35279112›Full record

ArticleBMC neurology2022

Opicapone versus placebo in the treatment of Parkinson's disease patients with end-of-dose motor fluctuation-associated pain: rationale and design of the randomised, double-blind OCEAN (OpiCapone Effect on motor fluctuations and pAiN) trial.

K Ray Chaudhuri, Per Odin, Joaquim J Ferreira, Angelo Antonini, Olivier Rascol, Mónica M Kurtis, Alexander Storch, Kirsty Bannister, Patrício Soares-da-Silva, Raquel Costa and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Objective assessment of the effects of opicapone in Parkinson's disease through kinematic analysis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Parkinson's disease therapy: what lies ahead?Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2023
    Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 7 countries.

K Ray ChaudhuriKing's College London, Department of Neurosciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience and Parkinson's Foundation Centre of Excellence, King's College Hospital, London, UK. ray.chaudhuri@kcl.ac.uk.
Per OdinDepartment of Neurology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Joaquim J FerreiraLaboratory of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Angelo AntoniniParkinson Disease and Movement Disorder Unit, Department of Neurosciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Olivier RascolToulouse Parkinson Expert Center, Departments of Neurosciences and Clinical Pharmacology, Centre d'Investigation Clinique de Toulouse CIC1436, NS-Park/FCRIN Network, and NeuroToul COEN Center, University Hospital of Toulouse, INSERM, University of Toulouse 3, Toulouse, France.
Mónica M KurtisMovement Disorders Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Ruber Internacional, Madrid, Spain.
Alexander StorchDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Center Rostock, and German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Rostock, Germany.
Kirsty BannisterInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Patrício Soares-da-SilvaBIAL - Portela & Ca S.A., Coronado, Portugal.
Raquel CostaBIAL - Portela & Ca S.A., Coronado, Portugal.
Diogo MagalhãesBIAL - Portela & Ca S.A., Coronado, Portugal.
José Francisco RochaBIAL - Portela & Ca S.A., Coronado, Portugal.
Bial (Portugal) · PTKing's College London · GBGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases · DEHospital Ruber Internacional · ESLund University · SEUniversité de Toulouse · FRUniversity of Lisbon · PTUniversity of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOptimisation of dopaminergic therapy may alleviate fluctuation-related pain in Parkinson's disease (PD). Opicapone (OPC) is a third-generation, once-daily catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitor shown to be generally well tolerated and efficacious in reducing OFF-time in two pivotal trials in patients with PD and end-of-dose motor fluctuations. The OpiCapone Effect on motor fluctuations and pAiN (OCEAN) trial aims to investigate the efficacy of OPC 50 mg in PD patients with end-of-dose motor fluctuations and associated pain, when administered as adjunctive therapy to existing treatment with levodopa/dopa decarboxylase inhibitor (DDCi).

methodsOCEAN is a Phase IV, international, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, interventional trial in PD patients with end-of-dose motor fluctuations and associated pain. It consists of a 1-week screening period, 24-week double-blind treatment period and 2-week follow-up period. Eligible patients will be randomised 1:1 to OPC 50 mg or placebo once daily while continuing current treatment with levodopa/DDCi and other chronic, stable anti-PD and/or analgesic treatments. The primary efficacy endpoint is change from baseline in Domain 3 (fluctuation-related pain) of the King's Parkinson's disease Pain Scale (KPPS). The key secondary efficacy endpoint is change from baseline in Domain B (anxiety) of the Movement Disorder Society-sponsored Non-Motor rating Scale (MDS-NMS). Additional secondary efficacy assessments include other domains and total scores of the KPPS and MDS-NMS, the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-8), the MDS-sponsored Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Parts III and IV, Clinical and Patient's Global Impressions of Change, and change in functional status via Hauser's diary. Safety assessments include the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events. The study will be conducted in approximately 140 patients from 50 clinical sites in Germany, Italy, Portugal, Spain and the United Kingdom. Recruitment started in February 2021 and the last patient is expected to complete the study by late 2022. DISCUSSION: The OCEAN trial will help determine whether the use of adjunctive OPC 50 mg treatment can improve fluctuation-associated pain in PD patients with end-of-dose motor fluctuations. The robust design of OCEAN will address the current lack of reliable evidence for dopaminergic-based therapy in the treatment of PD-associated pain.

trial registrationEudraCT number 2020-001175-32 ; registered on 2020-08-07.

Indexed as

Parkinson DiseaseAntiparkinson AgentsCatechol O-MethyltransferaseClinical Trials, Phase IV as TopicHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicOxadiazolesPainRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAntiparkinson AgentsCatechol O-MethyltransferaseopicaponeOxadiazolesDopamineKing’s Parkinson’s disease Pain ScaleLevodopaMotor fluctuationsNon-motor fluctuationsNon-motor symptomsOpicaponePainParkinson’s disease

Identifiers

PMID35279112
PMCPMC8917369
OpenAlexW4221073020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.