Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35279104›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2022

A novel nine-microRNA-based model to improve prognosis prediction of renal cell carcinoma.

Chen Xu, Hui Zeng, Junli Fan, Wenjie Huang, Xiaosi Yu, Shiqi Li, Fubing Wang, Xinghua Long

Open access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chen Xu *Department of Laboratory Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Hui Zeng *Center of Clinical Laboratory, Hangzhou Ninth People's Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Junli Fan *Department of Laboratory Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Wenjie HuangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Xiaosi YuDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Shiqi LiDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Fubing WangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China. wfb20042002@sina.com.
Xinghua LongDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China. zhoulongxinghua@qq.com.
Wuhan University · CNZhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith the improved knowledge of disease biology and the introduction of immune checkpoints, there has been significant progress in treating renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients. Individual treatment will differ according to risk stratification. As the clinical course varies in RCC, it has developed different predictive models for assessing patient's individual risk. However, among other prognostic scores, no transparent preference model was given. MicroRNA as a putative marker shown to have prognostic relevance in RCC, molecular analysis may provide an innovative benefit in the prophetic prediction and individual risk assessment. Therefore, this study aimed to establish a prognostic-related microRNA risk score model of RCC and further explore the relationship between the model and the immune microenvironment, immune infiltration, and immune checkpoints. This practical model has the potential to guide individualized surveillance protocols, patient counseling, and individualized treatment decision for RCC patients and facilitate to find more immunotherapy targets.

methodsDownloaded data of RCC from the TCGA database for difference analysis and divided it into a training set and validation set. Then the prognostic genes were screened out by Cox and Lasso regression analysis. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to establish a predictive model that divided patients into high-risk and low-risk groups. The ENCORI online website and the results of the RCC difference analysis were used to search for hub genes of miRNA. Estimate package and TIMER database were used to evaluate the relationship between risk score and tumor immune microenvironment (TME) and immune infiltration. Based on Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, search for immune checkpoints related to the prognosis of RCC.

resultsThere were nine miRNAs in the established model, with a concordance index of 0.702 and an area under the ROC curve of 0.701. Nine miRNAs were strongly correlated with the prognosis (P < 0.01), and those with high expression levels had a poor prognosis. We found a common target gene PDGFRA of hsa-miR-6718, hsa-miR-1269b and hsa-miR-374c, and five genes related to ICGs (KIR2DL3, TNFRSF4, LAG3, CD70 and TNFRSF9). The immune/stromal score, immune infiltration, and immune checkpoint genes of RCC were closely related to its prognosis and were positively associated with a risk score.

conclusionsThe established nine-miRNAs prognostic model has the potential to facilitate prognostic prediction. Moreover, this model was closely related to the immune microenvironment, immune infiltration, and immune checkpoint genes of RCC.

Indexed as

AdultCarcinoma, Renal CellDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansKidney NeoplasmsMaleMicroRNAsMiddle AgedProgression-Free SurvivalProportional Hazards ModelsReproducibility of ResultsTumor MicroenvironmentMicroRNAsImmune microenvironmentImmunotherapymiRNAPrognosisRenal cell carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID35279104
PMCPMC8918330
OpenAlexW4220885909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.