Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35279084›Full record

Trial reportBMC infectious diseases2022

Durable reduction of Clostridioides difficile infection recurrence and microbiome restoration after treatment with RBX2660: results from an open-label phase 2 clinical trial.

Robert Orenstein, Erik R Dubberke, Sahil Khanna, Christine H Lee, David Yoho, Stuart Johnson, Gail Hecht, Herbert L DuPont, Dale N Gerding, Ken F Blount and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC infectious diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02589847 (An Open-label Efficacy and Safety Assessment of Rebiotix RBX2660), which is not on this map. Cited by 54 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02589847 phase2completednot on this map

An Open-label Efficacy and Safety Assessment of Rebiotix RBX2660 (Microbiota Suspension) for the Treatment of Recurrent Clostridium Difficile Infection

TypeinterventionalSponsorRebiotix Inc.Ran2015 to 2019Enrolled272ConditionsClostridium Difficile InfectionArmsRBX2660, Standard of Care Antibiotics
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Safety and efficacy of fecal microbiota transplantation versus antibiotics for treating clostridioides difficile infection: systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Evaluation of fecal microbiota, live (RBL) for the prevention of recurrentJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Newer Therapeutics to Selectively KillInfectious disease reports · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. The evolving landscape of live biotherapeutics in the treatment of Clostridioides difficile infection.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2025
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Prevention of recurrentTherapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Robert OrensteinDivision of Infectious Diseases, Mayo Clinic in Arizona, 5777 e Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA. Orenstein.Robert@mayo.edu.
Erik R DubberkeDepartment of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Sahil KhannaDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Christine H LeeHamilton Regional Laboratory Medicine Program, Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
David YohoInfectious Diseases, Mid-Atlantic Permanente Medical Group, Springfield, VA, USA.
Stuart JohnsonInfectious Disease, Loyola University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Gail HechtDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL, USA.
Herbert L DuPontUniversity of Texas Health Science Center and Kelsey Research Foundation, Houston, TX, USA.
Dale N GerdingEdward Hines Jr. VA Hospital, Hines, IL, USA.
Ken F BlountRebiotix Inc., a Ferring Company, Roseville, MN, USA.
Sarah MischeRebiotix Inc., a Ferring Company, Roseville, MN, USA.
Adam HarveyRebiotix Inc., a Ferring Company, Roseville, MN, USA.
Loyola University Medical Center · USEdward Hines, Jr. VA Hospital · USKelsey Research Foundation · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USMayo Clinic in Florida · USUniversity of British Columbia · CAWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEffective treatment options for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI) are limited, with high recurrence rates associated with the current standard of care. Herein we report results from an open-label Phase 2 trial to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and durability of RBX2660-a standardized microbiota-based investigational live biotherapeutic-and a closely-matched historical control cohort.

methodsThis prospective, multicenter, open-label Phase 2 study enrolled patients who had experienced either ≥ 2 recurrences of CDI, treated by standard-of-care antibiotic therapy, after a primary CDI episode, or ≥ 2 episodes of severe CDI requiring hospitalization. Participants received up to 2 doses of RBX2660 rectally administered with doses 7 days apart. Treatment success was defined as the absence of CDI diarrhea without the need for retreatment for 8 weeks after completing study treatment. A historical control group with matched inclusion and exclusion criteria was identified from a retrospective chart review of participants treated with standard-of-care antibiotics for recurrent CDI who matched key criteria for the study. The primary objective was to compare treatment success of RBX2660 to the historical control group. A key secondary outcome was the safety profile of RBX2660, including adverse events and CDI occurrence through 24 months after treatment. In addition, fecal samples from RBX2660-treated participants were sequenced to evaluate microbiome composition and functional changes from before to after treatment.

resultsIn this Phase 2 open-label clinical trial, RBX2660 demonstrated a 78.9% (112/142) treatment success rate compared to a 30.7% (23/75) for the historical control group (p < 0.0001; Chi-square test). Post-hoc analysis indicated that 91% (88/97) of evaluable RBX2660 responders remained CDI occurrence-free to 24 months after treatment demonstrating durability. RBX2660 was well-tolerated with mostly mild to moderate adverse events. The composition and diversity of RBX2660 responders' fecal microbiome significantly changed from before to after treatment to become more similar to RBX2660, and these changes were durable to 24 months after treatment.

conclusionsIn this Phase 2 trial, RBX2660 was safe and effective for reducing rCDI recurrence as compared to a historical control group. Microbiome changes are consistent with restorative changes implicated in resisting C. difficile recurrence. Clinical Trials Registration NCT02589847 (10/28/2015).

Indexed as

Clostridioides difficileClostridium InfectionsMicrobiotaFecal Microbiota TransplantationHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesClinical trialClostridioides difficileDurabilityMicrobiota-based therapyRecurrenceResponse

Identifiers

PMID35279084
PMCPMC8917640
OpenAlexW4220914817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.