ArticleBMC genomics2022
Improvement of prediction ability by integrating multi-omic datasets in barley.
Article in BMC genomics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Research progress on genomic selection breeding technology for crops.Protoplasma · 2026Review
- Climate change and crop resilience: harnessing metabolomics for predicting stress tolerance.The New phytologist · 2026Review
- Methylome differences among barley inbreds and their association with genomic, transcriptomic, and phenotypic variation.Journal of experimental botany · 2026Article
- Multi-trait and multi-environment genomic prediction enhances yield components improvement in durum wheat.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Transfer learning with multiomics integration and deep neural networks reveals drug resistance mechanisms in cancer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Assessment of genomic prediction capabilities of transcriptome data in a barley multi-parent RIL population.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025Article
- Interspecies predictions of growth traits from quantitative transcriptome data acquired during fruit development.Journal of experimental botany · 2025Article
- Unlocking gene regulatory networks for crop resilience and sustainable agriculture.Nature biotechnology · 2025Review
- Integrating multi-omics and machine learning for disease resistance prediction in legumes.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025Review
- Machine Learning-Based identification of resistance genes associated with sunflower broomrape.Plant methods · 2025Article
- Metabolic marker-assisted genomic prediction improves hybrid breeding.Plant communications · 2025Article
- Exploring natural genetic variation in photosynthesis-related traits of barley in the field.Journal of experimental botany · 2024Article
- Using drone-retrieved multispectral data for phenomic selection in potato breeding.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2024Article
- Feature engineering of environmental covariates improves plant genomic-enabled prediction.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Efficacy of plant breeding using genomic information.The plant genome · 2023Article
- Do feature selection methods for selecting environmental covariables enhance genomic prediction accuracy?Frontiers in genetics · 2023Article
- Genomics combined with UAS data enhances prediction of grain yield in winter wheat.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGenomic prediction (GP) based on single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) has become a broadly used tool to increase the gain of selection in plant breeding. However, using predictors that are biologically closer to the phenotypes such as transcriptome and metabolome may increase the prediction ability in GP. The objectives of this study were to (i) assess the prediction ability for three yield-related phenotypic traits using different omic datasets as single predictors compared to a SNP array, where these omic datasets included different types of sequence variants (full-SV, deleterious-dSV, and tolerant-tSV), different types of transcriptome (expression presence/absence variation-ePAV, gene expression-GE, and transcript expression-TE) sampled from two tissues, leaf and seedling, and metabolites (M); (ii) investigate the improvement in prediction ability when combining multiple omic datasets information to predict phenotypic variation in barley breeding programs; (iii) explore the predictive performance when using SV, GE, and ePAV from simulated 3'end mRNA sequencing of different lengths as predictors.
resultsThe prediction ability from genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) for the three traits using dSV information was higher than when using tSV, all SV information, or the SNP array. Any predictors from the transcriptome (GE, TE, as well as ePAV) and metabolome provided higher prediction abilities compared to the SNP array and SV on average across the three traits. In addition, some (di)-similarity existed between different omic datasets, and therefore provided complementary biological perspectives to phenotypic variation. Optimal combining the information of dSV, TE, ePAV, as well as metabolites into GP models could improve the prediction ability over that of the single predictors alone.
conclusionsThe use of integrated omic datasets in GP model is highly recommended. Furthermore, we evaluated a cost-effective approach generating 3'end mRNA sequencing with transcriptome data extracted from seedling without losing prediction ability in comparison to the full-length mRNA sequencing, paving the path for the use of such prediction methods in commercial breeding programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.