Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35278794›Full record

ArticleDiagnostic microbiology and infectious disease2022

Lower persistence of anti-nucleocapsid compared to anti-spike antibodies up to one year after SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Jan Van Elslande, Matthijs Oyaert, Natalie Lorent, Yannick Vande Weygaerde, Gijs Van Pottelbergh, Lode Godderis, Marc Van Ranst, Emmanuel André, Elizaveta Padalko, Katrien Lagrou and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Extending ImmunoSpotVaccines · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jan Van ElslandeClinical Department of Laboratory Medicine and National Reference Center for Respiratory Pathogens, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Matthijs OyaertClinical Department of Laboratory Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Natalie LorentClinical Department of Pneumology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Yannick Vande WeygaerdeDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Gijs Van PottelberghAcademic Centre of General Practice/Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Lode GodderisEnvironment and Health, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; IDEWE, External Service for Prevention and Protection at Work, Heverlee, Belgium.
Marc Van RanstClinical Department of Laboratory Medicine and National Reference Center for Respiratory Pathogens, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Emmanuel AndréClinical Department of Laboratory Medicine and National Reference Center for Respiratory Pathogens, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Elizaveta PadalkoClinical Department of Laboratory Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Katrien LagrouClinical Department of Laboratory Medicine and National Reference Center for Respiratory Pathogens, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Stien VandendriesscheClinical Department of Laboratory Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Pieter VermeerschClinical Department of Laboratory Medicine and National Reference Center for Respiratory Pathogens, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. Electronic address: pieter.vermeersch@uzleuven.be.
KU Leuven · BEGhent University Hospital · BEEuropean External Action Service · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We retrospectively compared the long-term evolution of IgG anti-spike (S) and anti-nucleocapsid (N) levels (Abbott immunoassays) in 116 non-severe and 115 severe SARS-CoV-2 infected patients from 2 university hospitals up to 365 days post positive RT-PCR. IgG anti-S and anti-N antibody levels decayed exponentially up to 365 days after a peak 0 to 59 days after positive RT-PCR. Peak antibody level/cut-off ratio 0 to 59 days after positive RT-PCR was more than 70 for anti-S compared to less than 6 for anti-N (P < 0.01). Anti-S and anti-N were significantly higher in severe compared to non-severe patients up to 180 to 239 days and 300 to 365 days, respectively (P < 0.05). Despite similar half-lives, the estimated time to 50% seronegativity was more than 2 years for anti-S compared to less than 1 year for anti-N in non-severe and severe COVID-19 patients, due to the significantly higher peak antibody level/cut-off ratio for anti-S compared to anti-N.

Indexed as

COVID-19Antibodies, ViralHumansImmunoglobulin GRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2Sensitivity and SpecificityAntibodies, ViralImmunoglobulin GCOVID-19COVID-19 testingIgGImmunoassayNucleocapsidSARS-CoV-2Serological TestingSpike

Identifiers

PMID35278794
PMCPMC8837483
OpenAlexW4210988539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.