Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35278750›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of nursing studies2022

COVID-19 pandemic-related mortality, infection, symptoms, complications, comorbidities, and other aspects of physical health among healthcare workers globally: An umbrella review.

Muhammad Chutiyami, Umar Muhammad Bello, Dauda Salihu, Dorothy Ndwiga, Mustapha Adam Kolo, Reshin Maharaj, Kogi Naidoo, Liza Devar, Pratitha Pratitha, Priya Kannan

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of nursing studies, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
13.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Clinical Symptom Patterns as Predictors of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Healthcare Workers in Puerto Rico.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Muhammad ChutiyamiSchool of Nursing, Institute of Health & Management, Sydney, Australia. Electronic address: muhammad.c@ihm.edu.au.
Umar Muhammad BelloHong Kong Science Park, Centre for Eye and Vision Research (CEVR) Limited, Hong Kong, China; Department of Physiotherapy, Yobe State University Teaching Hospital, Damaturu, Yobe, Nigeria.
Dauda SalihuSchool of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.
Dorothy NdwigaSchool of Nursing, Institute of Health & Management, Sydney, Australia.
Mustapha Adam KoloDepartment of Geography, University of Maiduguri, Nigeria.
Reshin MaharajSchool of Nursing, Institute of Health & Management, Sydney, Australia.
Kogi NaidooInstitute of Health & Management, Melbourne, Australia.
Liza DevarSchool of Nursing, Institute of Health & Management, Sydney, Australia.
Pratitha PratithaSchool of Nursing, Institute of Health & Management, Sydney, Australia.
Priya KannanDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.
Hong Kong Polytechnic University · HKInstitute of Business Management · PKUniversity of Maiduguri · NGYobe State University · NG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has continued to cause unprecedented concern across the globe since the beginning of the outbreak. Healthcare workers, particularly those working on the front line, remain one of the most affected groups. Various studies have investigated different aspects of the physical health of healthcare workers; however, limited evidence on the overall physical health of healthcare workers has been collectively examined.

aimTo examine the various aspects of physical health and well-being of healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic.

designAn umbrella review.

methodsWe conducted a comprehensive literature search on Academic Search Premier, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and MEDLINE and supplemented the search with Google Scholar. Key terms related to 'COVID-19', 'physical health', 'healthcare worker' and 'systematic review' were used in the search. Systematic reviews with or without meta-analyses were included if they were published in the English language, could be obtained in full-text format, and assessed the physical health impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare workers were included. The methodological quality of eligible studies was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute's checklist for systematic reviews. The data were narratively synthesised in line with the 'Synthesis Without Meta-analysis' guideline.

resultsThirteen systematic reviews (represented as K = 13) that synthesized data from 1230 primary studies/reports and 1,040,336 participants met the inclusion criteria. The findings indicate a death rate of between 0.3 and 54.2 per 100 infections (K = 4). The overall case-fatality rate was estimated to be 0.87% (approximately 9 deaths per 1000 infections, K = 3). The overall infection rate among healthcare workers ranged from 3.9% to 11% (K = 5), with the highest rate associated with healthcare workers involved in screening. Considering geographic regions, the highest number of infections was reported in Europe (78.2% of 152,888 infected healthcare workers, K = 1). More nurses and female healthcare workers were infected, while deaths occurred mainly among men and medical doctors. The commonly reported symptoms included cough (56-80%, K = 3), fever (57-85%, K = 3), and headache (7-81%, K = 3), while hypertension was the most prevalent comorbidity (7%, K = 1). Additionally, a high prevalence of poor sleep quality (41-43%, K = 2), work-related stress (33-44.86%, K = 5) and personal protective equipment-associated skin injuries (48.2-97%, K = 2) affected the healthcare workers. The most reported preventive measures included laboratory testing, clinical diagnosis, adequate personal protective equipment, self-isolation, and training/orientation for infection control.

conclusionHealthcare workers experienced considerable COVID-19-related physical health issues, including mortalities. This requires targeted interventions and health policies to support healthcare workers worldwide to ensure timely management of the pandemic. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: This umbrella review highlights the global mortalities, infections, and other aspects of physical health of healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19ComorbidityFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansMalePandemicsSystematic Reviews as TopicCOVID-19Healthcare workersMortalityReview of reviewWell-being

Identifiers

PMID35278750
PMCPMC8855608
OpenAlexW4213245299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.