Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35278360›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of ophthalmology2022

A Prospective Longitudinal Study to Investigate Corneal Hysteresis as a Risk Factor of Central Visual Field Progression in Glaucoma.

Alireza Kamalipour, Sasan Moghimi, Medi Eslani, Takashi Nishida, Vahid Mohammadzadeh, Eleonora Micheletti, Christopher A Girkin, Massimo A Fazio, Jeffrey M Liebmann, Linda M Zangwill and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alireza KamalipourHamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Sasan MoghimiHamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Medi EslaniHamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Takashi NishidaHamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Vahid MohammadzadehHamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Eleonora MichelettiHamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Christopher A GirkinDepartment of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, Callahan Eye Hospital.
Massimo A FazioHamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California; Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Heersink School of Medicine; Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering.
Jeffrey M LiebmannUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Alabama, and Bernard and Shirlee Brown Glaucoma Research Laboratory, Department of Ophthalmology, Edward S. Harkness Eye Institute, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Linda M ZangwillHamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Robert N WeinrebHamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California. Electronic address: rweinreb@ucsd.edu.
University of California San Diego · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

Visual Phenotyping CoreP30EY003039 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI LAWRENCE C SINCICH · 1985 to 2026
$16.9M
African Descent And Glaucoma Evaluation Study (ADAGES)U10EY014267 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI ZANGWILL, LINDA M · 2002 to 2010
$13.2M
Vision BiostatisticsP30EY022589 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Derek Stuart Welsbie · 2012 to 2026
$10.3M
Diagnostic Innovations in Glaucoma:Structural AssessmentR01EY011008 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI ZANGWILL, LINDA M · 1995 to 2015
$8.7M
Diagnostic Innovations in Glaucoma Study (DIGS): High Myopia and Advanced DiseaseR01EY027510 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI LINDA M ZANGWILL · 2017 to 2026
$5.3M
Diagnosis and Monitoring of Glaucoma with Optical Coherence Tomography AngiographyR01EY029058 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI WEINREB, ROBERT N · 2018 to 2024
$4.2M
African Descent and Glaucoma Evaluation (ADAGES) II: Glaucoma ProgressionR01EY019869 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI ZANGWILL, LINDA M · 2010 to 2014
$2.8M
African Descent and Glaucoma Evaluation (ADAGES) IV: Alterations of the lamina cribrosa in progressionR01EY026574 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI FAZIO, MASSIMO ANTONIO, GIRKIN, CHRISTOPHER ANTHONY · 2017 to 2020
$2.6M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY003039NEI NIH HHS P30 EY022589NEI NIH HHS R01 EY011008NEI NIH HHS R01 EY019869NEI NIH HHS R01 EY026574NEI NIH HHS R01 EY027510NEI NIH HHS R01 EY029058NEI NIH HHS U10 EY014267
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the role of corneal hysteresis (CH) as a risk factor of central visual field (VF) progression in a cohort of glaucoma suspect and glaucoma patients.

designProspective cohort study.

methodsTwo hundred forty-eight eyes of 143 subjects who were followed for an average of 4.8 years with a minimum of 5 visits with 10-2 and 24-2 VF tests were included. Univariable and multivariable linear mixed-effects models were used to identify characteristics associated with the rate of change over time in 10-2 and 24-2 mean deviation (MD). Mixed-effects logistic regression was used to evaluate characteristics associated with an increased likelihood of event-based 10-2 VF progression based on the clustered pointwise linear regression criterion.

resultsCH was significantly associated with 10-2 and 24-2 VF progression in the univariable trend-based analysis. In multivariable trend-based analyses, lower CH was associated with a faster rate of decline in 10-2 MD (0.07 dB/y per 1 mm Hg, P < .001) but not with 24-2 MD (P = .490). In multivariable event-based analysis, lower CH was associated with an increased likelihood of 10-2 VF progression (odds ratio = 1.35 per 1 mm Hg lower, P = .025). Similar results were found in eyes with early glaucomatous damage at the baseline (baseline: 24-2 MD ≥ -6 dB).

conclusionsLower CH was associated with a statistically significant, but relatively small, increased risk of central VF progression on the 10-2 test grid. Given the substantial influence of central VF impairment on the quality of life, clinicians should consider using CH to assess the risk of progression in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma including those with early disease.

Indexed as

GlaucomaGlaucoma, Open-AngleDisease ProgressionHumansIntraocular PressureLongitudinal StudiesProspective StudiesQuality of LifeRisk FactorsVision DisordersVisual FieldsVisual Field Tests

Identifiers

PMID35278360
PMCPMC10249485
OpenAlexW4220852516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.