Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35278200›Full record

ArticleEuropean geriatric medicine2022

Towards developing a Core Outcome Set for malnutrition intervention studies in older adults: a scoping review to identify frequently used research outcomes.

M Visser, N Mendonça, C Avgerinou, T Cederholm, A J Cruz-Jentoft, S Goisser, E Kiesswetter, H M Siebentritt, D Volkert, G Torbahn

Open access · hybridAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in European geriatric medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 7 countries.

M VisserDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. m.visser@vu.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-5136-298X
N MendonçaEpiDoC Unit, CEDOC, NOVA Medical School, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-7589-9901
C AvgerinouDepartment of Primary Care and Population Health, UCL Research, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1445-1676
T CederholmDepartment of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-3705-0725
A J Cruz-JentoftServicio de Geriatría, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal (IRYCIS), Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7628-4861
S GoisserCenter for Geriatric Medicine, AGAPLESION Bethanien Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8141-3581
E KiesswetterInstitute for Biomedicine of Aging, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Kobergerstr. 60, 90408, Nürnberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1721-215X
H M SiebentrittInstitute for Biomedicine of Aging, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Kobergerstr. 60, 90408, Nürnberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0407-3069
D VolkertInstitute for Biomedicine of Aging, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Kobergerstr. 60, 90408, Nürnberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1003-6395
G TorbahnInstitute for Biomedicine of Aging, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Kobergerstr. 60, 90408, Nürnberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1463-3119
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEDepartment of Health · ZAHeidelberg University · DEInstituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria · ESUniversidade Nova de Lisboa · PTUniversity College London · GBUppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo conduct a scoping review to provide a systematic overview of outcomes used in nutritional intervention studies focused on the treatment of protein-energy malnutrition in older adults.

methodsA systematic search of four electronic databases (Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) was performed to retrieve randomized controlled trials (RCTs), published until March 9, 2020, that evaluated the effect of nutritional interventions to treat protein-energy malnutrition in older adults and those at risk for malnutrition. Two authors screened titles, abstracts and full texts independently. One author extracted data that were cross-checked by another author.

resultsSixty-three articles reporting 60 RCTs were identified. Most frequently used outcomes included body weight/body mass index (75.0% of RCTs), dietary intake (61.7%), functional limitations (48.3%), handgrip strength (46.7%), and body circumference (40.0%). The frequencies differed by setting (community, hospital and long-term care). For some outcomes there was a preferred assessment method (e.g., Barthel index for functional limitations), while for other outcomes (e.g., functional performance) a much greater variation was observed.

conclusionA large variation in outcomes, not only across but also within settings, was identified in nutritional intervention studies in malnourished older adults and those at risk. Furthermore, for many outcomes there was a large variation in the used assessment method. These results highlight the need for developing a Core Outcome Set for malnutrition intervention studies in older adults to facilitate future meta-analyses that may enhance our understanding on the effectiveness of treatment.

Indexed as

MalnutritionProtein-Energy MalnutritionAgedHospitalsHumansOutcome Assessment, Health CareAgingDietary counsellingONSUndernutrition

Identifiers

PMID35278200
PMCPMC9378339
OpenAlexW4220736232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.