Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35278145›Full record

ArticleThe ultrasound journal2022

Design and comparison of a hybrid to a traditional in-person point-of-care ultrasound course.

Michael Janjigian, Anne Dembitzer, Caroline Srisarajivakul-Klein, Aron Mednick, Khemraj Hardower, Deborah Cooke, Sondra Zabar, Harald Sauthoff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ultrasound journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Michael JanjigianDepartment of Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, NYC Health & Hospitals/Bellevue, Bellevue Hospital Center, New York, USA. janjigian@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3315-923X
Anne DembitzerDepartment of Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, NY Harbor Healthcare System, New York, USA.
Caroline Srisarajivakul-KleinDepartment of Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, NYC Health & Hospitals/Bellevue, Bellevue Hospital Center, New York, USA.
Aron MednickDepartment of Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, USA.
Khemraj HardowerDepartment of Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, USA.
Deborah CookeDepartment of Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, USA.
Sondra ZabarDepartment of Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, USA.
Harald SauthoffDepartment of Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, NY Harbor Healthcare System, New York, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTraditional introductory point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) courses are resource intensive, typically requiring 2-3 days at a remote site, consisting of lectures and hands-on components. Social distancing requirements resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic led us to create a novel hybrid course curriculum consisting of virtual and in-person components.

methodsFaculty, chief residents, fellows and advanced practice providers (APPs) in the Department of Medicine were invited to participate in the hybrid curriculum. The course structure included 4 modules of recorded lectures, quizzes, online image interpretation sessions, online case discussions, and hands-on sessions at the bedside of course participant's patients. The components of the course were delivered over approximately 8 months. Those participants who completed a minimum of 3 modules over the year were invited for final assessments. Results from the hybrid curriculum cohort were compared to the year-end data from a prior traditional in-person cohort.

resultsParticipant knowledge scores were not different between traditional (n = 19) and hybrid (n = 24) groups (81% and 84%, respectively, P = 0.9). There was no change in POCUS skills as measured by the hands-on test from both groups at end-of-course (76% and 76%, respectively, P = 0.93). Confidence ratings were similar across groups from 2.73 traditional to 3.0 hybrid (out of possible 4, P = 0.46). Participants rated the course highly, with an average overall rating of 4.6 out 5.

conclusionsA hybrid virtual and in-person POCUS course was highly rated and as successful as a traditional course in improving learner knowledge, hands-on skill and confidence at 8 months after course initiation. These results support expanding virtual elements of POCUS educational curricula.

Indexed as

Medical educationPoint-of-care ultrasoundProgram assessment

Identifiers

PMID35278145
PMCPMC8917361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.