Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35277986›Full record

Trial reportThe International journal of eating disorders2022

Understanding self-monitoring to inform a mobile intervention for binge eating and weight management: A proof-of-concept randomized trial.

Jianyi Liu, Sean A Munson, Angela Chang, Claire Voss, Andrea K Graham

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The International journal of eating disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jianyi LiuCenter for Behavioral Intervention Technologies, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5065-1771
Sean A MunsonHuman Centered Design & Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0472-6138
Angela ChangCenter for Behavioral Intervention Technologies, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3421-5264
Claire VossCenter for Behavioral Intervention Technologies, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4652-7476
Andrea K GrahamCenter for Behavioral Intervention Technologies, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9736-8906
Northwestern University · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Technology Enabled Services for Coordinated Care of Depression in Healthcare SettingsP50MH119029 · NIMH · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI Rachel Kornfield · 2020 to 2026
$10.7M
Testing Intervention Strategies for Addressing Obesity and Binge EatingK01DK116925 · NIDDK · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI GRAHAM, ANDREA KASS · 2018 to 2022
$799k
NIDDK NIH HHS K01 DK116925NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH119029
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study explored consumers' perspectives on self-monitoring, a common feature in behavioral interventions that helps inform consumers' progress and answer their questions, to learn what outcome metrics matter to consumers and whether self-selection of these metrics leads to greater engagement (i.e., compliance, satisfaction) in self-monitoring than monitoring only default options.

methodsIn a proof-of-concept randomized trial, 48 adult participants were randomly assigned to "clinician-determined monitoring" or "clinician + self-determined monitoring" conditions. Before starting monitoring, all participants shared outcomes that would matter to them in a mobile intervention for binge eating and weight management. Then, for 3 weeks, participants in the "clinician-determined" condition monitored their weight and binge-eating episodes, and participants in the "clinician + self-determined" condition monitored these and another metric of their choosing. After, satisfaction and compliance were assessed.

resultsParticipants identified 116 metrics, grouped into 12 themes, that mattered to them. During monitoring, participants in the "clinician + self-determined" condition monitored 41 metrics. Surprisingly, participants in the "clinician-determined" condition also monitored metrics besides weight and binge eating. This resulted in a failure of our experimental manipulation, which represents a significant limitation of this research. No significant differences emerged in satisfaction or compliance between conditions. DISCUSSION: Although our proof-of-concept trial yielded null quantitative results, findings also suggested binge eating and weight management interventions may benefit from including an individually customizable monitoring option in addition to default metrics, warranting testing in future research. PUBLIC SIGNIFICANCE: Examining consumers' self-monitoring preferences for a mobile intervention for binge eating and weight management revealed a variety of metrics that matter to consumers, although binge eating and weight were still most valued. Findings from our proof-of-concept trial suggest design implications of encouraging an individually customizable monitoring option, in addition to default metrics, which needs to be tested in future research over a longer period and during actual mobile intervention delivery.

Indexed as

Binge-Eating DisorderBulimiaAdultBehavior TherapyHumansTreatment Outcomebinge eatingmobile interventionself-monitoringuser-centered designweight management

Identifiers

PMID35277986
PMCPMC9314870
OpenAlexW4220982766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.