Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35277975›Full record

Observational studyJournal of medical virology2022

Short and mid-term SARS-CoV-2 antibody response after inactivated COVID-19 vaccine in hemodialysis and kidney transplant patients.

Hamad Dheir, Aysel Tocoglu, Hande Toptan, Musa Pinar, Taner Demirci, Mehmet Koroglu, Selcuk Yaylaci, Ahmed Bilal Genc, Ahmed Cihad Genc, Necattin Firat and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of medical virology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hamad DheirDivision of Nephrology, Sakarya University, Serdivan, Sakarya, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-3569-6269
Aysel TocogluDepartment of Internal Medicine, Sakarya University, Serdivan, Sakarya, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-9078-6996
Hande ToptanDepartment of Microbiology, Sakarya University, Serdivan, Sakarya, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-6893-8490
Musa PinarDivision of Nephrology, Sakarya University, Serdivan, Sakarya, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-8164-6302
Taner DemirciDivision of Endocrinology, Sakarya University, Serdivan, Sakarya, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-9579-4530
Mehmet KorogluDepartment of Microbiology, Sakarya University, Serdivan, Sakarya, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-8101-1104
Selcuk YaylaciDepartment of Internal Medicine, Sakarya University, Serdivan, Sakarya, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-6768-7973
Ahmed Bilal GencDepartment of Internal Medicine, Sakarya University, Serdivan, Sakarya, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-1607-6355
Ahmed Cihad GencDepartment of Internal Medicine, Sakarya University, Serdivan, Sakarya, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-7725-707X
Necattin FiratDepartment of General Surgery, Sakarya University, Serdivan, Sakarya, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-0684-8187
Oguz KarabayDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, Sakarya University, Serdivan, Sakarya, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-1514-1685
Savas SipahiDivision of Nephrology, Sakarya University, Serdivan, Sakarya, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-6829-121X
Sakarya University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The efficacy of the inactivated severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccine has not been fully elucidated across the whole spectrum of patients on kidney replacement therapy. We aimed to characterize the long-term antibody response of inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine administered in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) and hemodialysis (HD) patients. We performed this prospective observational study in 50 HD, 64 KTR, and 41 healthy control groups (HG) given two doses of CoronaVac. We measured anti-Spike antibodies after 28 days of every vaccine dose, 3rd and 6th months after the first dose, and compared them between cohorts. After two doses, an anti-spike immunoglobulin G of ≥50 AU/ml was present in HD, KTR, and HG as 44%, 7.2%, and 58.5%, respectively (p < 0.001). Furthermore, the proportion of antibody titers peaked at 86.5%, 23%, and 97.6% (p < 0.001) at the 3rd month and decreased significantly at the 6th month in most HD and HG participants, whereas this effect was not observed in KTRs from basal until the 6th month (p < 0.001). During the follow-up, the incidence of coronavirus disease 2019 disease was higher (p < 0.003) in KTRs compared to the other groups, but there was no requirement for an intensive care unit and no death was recorded. We found a negative correlation between antibody seroconversion and age (p < 0.016). The antibody response following inactivated vaccine in dialysis patients is almost comparable to controls for 6 months. In contrast, kidney transplant patients have a poor response. These findings reinforce the need to discuss the vaccination strategy in immunocompromised patients, including the third dose with homologous or heterologous vaccines.

Indexed as

COVID-19Kidney TransplantationAntibodies, ViralAntibody FormationCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansRenal DialysisSARS-CoV-2Antibodies, ViralCOVID-19 VaccinesCOVID-19dialysisinactivated vaccinekidney diseasekidney transplantationSARAS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID35277975
PMCPMC9088488
OpenAlexW4220675884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.