Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35277961›Full record

ArticleGigaScience2022

Chromosome-level genome assembly, annotation, and phylogenomics of the gooseneck barnacle Pollicipes pollicipes.

James P Bernot, Pavel Avdeyev, Anton Zamyatin, Niklas Dreyer, Nikita Alexeev, Marcos Pérez-Losada, Keith A Crandall

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GigaScience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Evolutionary dynamics of the arthropod molting machinery.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 5 countries.

James P BernotComputational Biology Institute, Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1769-8631
Pavel AvdeyevComputational Biology Institute, Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7953-6259
Anton ZamyatinComputer Technologies Laboratory, ITMO University, Saint-Petersburg 197101, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-5402-1796
Niklas DreyerDepartment of Life Science, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei 106, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-1391-1642
Nikita AlexeevComputer Technologies Laboratory, ITMO University, Saint-Petersburg 197101, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-3415-9565
Marcos Pérez-LosadaComputational Biology Institute, Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2585-4657
Keith A CrandallComputational Biology Institute, Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0836-3389
ITMO University · RUMilken Institute · USSmithsonian Institution · USUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe barnacles are a group of >2,000 species that have fascinated biologists, including Darwin, for centuries. Their lifestyles are extremely diverse, from free-swimming larvae to sessile adults, and even root-like endoparasites. Barnacles also cause hundreds of millions of dollars of losses annually due to biofouling. However, genomic resources for crustaceans, and barnacles in particular, are lacking.

resultsUsing 62× Pacific Biosciences coverage, 189× Illumina whole-genome sequencing coverage, 203× HiC coverage, and 69× CHi-C coverage, we produced a chromosome-level genome assembly of the gooseneck barnacle Pollicipes pollicipes. The P. pollicipes genome is 770 Mb long and its assembly is one of the most contiguous and complete crustacean genomes available, with a scaffold N50 of 47 Mb and 90.5% of the BUSCO Arthropoda gene set. Using the genome annotation produced here along with transcriptomes of 13 other barnacle species, we completed phylogenomic analyses on a nearly 2 million amino acid alignment. Contrary to previous studies, our phylogenies suggest that the Pollicipedomorpha is monophyletic and sister to the Balanomorpha, which alters our understanding of barnacle larval evolution and suggests homoplasy in a number of naupliar characters. We also compared transcriptomes of P. pollicipes nauplius larvae and adults and found that nearly one-half of the genes in the genome are differentially expressed, highlighting the vastly different transcriptomes of larvae and adult gooseneck barnacles. Annotation of the genes with KEGG and GO terms reveals that these stages exhibit many differences including cuticle binding, chitin binding, microtubule motor activity, and membrane adhesion.

conclusionThis study provides high-quality genomic resources for a key group of crustaceans. This is especially valuable given the roles P. pollicipes plays in European fisheries, as a sentinel species for coastal ecosystems, and as a model for studying barnacle adhesion as well as its key position in the barnacle tree of life. A combination of genomic, phylogenetic, and transcriptomic analyses here provides valuable insights into the evolution and development of barnacles.

Indexed as

ThoracicaAnimalsChromosomesEcosystemPhylogenyTranscriptomeannotationassemblybarnaclecrustaceagenomelarval evolutionphylogenyPollicipes

Identifiers

PMID35277961
PMCPMC8917513
OpenAlexW4220747738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.