Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35277950›Full record

ArticleAnimal models and experimental medicine2022

Validation of a preclinical dry eye model in New Zealand white rabbits during and following topical instillation of 1% ophthalmic atropine sulfate.

Alejandra Sánchez-Ríos, Elba Yadira Correa-Gallegos, José Manuel Medina-Espinoza, Andrea Anaid Navarro-Sanchez, Oscar Olvera-Montaño, Leopoldo Baiza-Durán, Patricia Muñoz-Villegas

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal models and experimental medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alejandra Sánchez-RíosMedical Affairs Department, Laboratorios Sophia, SA de CV, Zapopan, Jalisco, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-8034-8071
Elba Yadira Correa-GallegosMedical Affairs Department, Laboratorios Sophia, SA de CV, Zapopan, Jalisco, Mexico.
José Manuel Medina-EspinozaMedical Affairs Department, Laboratorios Sophia, SA de CV, Zapopan, Jalisco, Mexico.
Andrea Anaid Navarro-SanchezMedical Affairs Department, Laboratorios Sophia, SA de CV, Zapopan, Jalisco, Mexico.
Oscar Olvera-MontañoMedical Affairs Department, Laboratorios Sophia, SA de CV, Zapopan, Jalisco, Mexico.
Leopoldo Baiza-DuránMedical Affairs Department, Laboratorios Sophia, SA de CV, Zapopan, Jalisco, Mexico.
Patricia Muñoz-VillegasMedical Affairs Department, Laboratorios Sophia, SA de CV, Zapopan, Jalisco, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-7559-1218
Laboratorios Sophia (Mexico) · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe objective of this study was to validate an animal model for dry eye during and after the administration of 1% ophthalmic atropine sulfate (OAS) in New Zealand white (NZW) rabbits.

methodsOAS (1%) was applied three times per day to 30 eyes of 15 healthy NZW rabbits. Sacrifice, enucleation, and lacrimal gland removal took place on days 15, 21, and 30 (OAS group). A second group (n = 5) was used as control. Clinical evaluations took place on days 3, 10, 15, 18, 21, 24 and 30. The primary endpoints were: Schirmer I test, tear break-up time (TBUT), and corneal fluorescein staining. As secondary endpoints, clinical changes including intraocular pressure, and histopathology were evaluated.

resultsWhile OAS was administered, the Schirmer I test showed a statistically significant reduction for OAS group versus control (p < 0.001), and versus basal production (p < 0.001). TBUT showed statistically significant differences between groups (days 3 and 10; p = 0.001) and versus basal values (day 3; p < 0.001). Fluorescein staining showed a statistically significant difference (day 3; p = 0.001). The most frequent clinical finding was conjunctival hyperemia (76.9% OAS vs. 20% control). For histopathology, all OAS subjects presented some degree of inflammation (86.7% minimal; 13.3% mild) whereas the control presented only 30% minimal inflammation. Goblet cell density showed no difference.

conclusionsThe effectiveness of the OAS dry eye model in NZW rabbits as reported in previous studies was confirmed, provided that the application of the drug is maintained throughout the intervention; it is not a viable model after OAS administration is suspended.

Indexed as

Dry Eye SyndromesLacrimal ApparatusAnimalsAtropineFluoresceinInflammationRabbitsAtropineFluoresceinatropine sulfatedry eyerabbit modelsafetySchirmer I testTBUT

Identifiers

PMID35277950
PMCPMC9240734
OpenAlexW4221069075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.