ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2022
Generation of synthetic training data for SEEG electrodes segmentation.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI enabled decision support systems in epilepsy surgery a scoping review.Research square · 2026Article
- Deep learning enabled decision support systems in epilepsy surgery: a scoping review.npj health systems · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeStereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) is a minimally invasive surgical procedure, used to locate epileptogenic zones. An accurate identification of the metallic contacts recording the SEEG signal is crucial to ensure effectiveness of the upcoming treatment. However, due to the presence of metal, post-operative CT scans contain strong streak artefacts that interfere with deep learning segmentation algorithms and require a lot of training data to distinguish from actual contacts. We propose a method to generate synthetic data and use them to train a neural network to precisely locate SEEG electrode contacts.
methodsRandom electrodes were generated following manufacturer's specifications and dimensions and placed in acceptable regions inside metal-free CT images. Metal artefacts were simulated in the generated data set using radon transform, beam hardening, and filtered back projection. A UNet neural network was trained for the contacts segmentation task using various training set-ups combining real data, basic augmented data, and synthetic data. The results were compared.
resultsWe reported a higher accuracy when including synthetic data during the network training, while training only on real and basic augmented data more often led to misclassified artefacts or missed contacts. The network segments post-operative CT slices in less than 2 s using 4 GeForce RTX2080 Ti GPUs and in under a minute using a standard PC with GeForce GTX1060.
conclusionUsing synthetic data to train the network significantly improves contact detection and segmentation accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35277804What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.