Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35277760›Full record

ReviewThe AAPS journal2022

Development of In Vitro Dissolution Testing Methods to Simulate Fed Conditions for Immediate Release Solid Oral Dosage Forms.

Timothy R Lex, Jason D Rodriguez, Lei Zhang, Wenlei Jiang, Zongming Gao

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in The AAPS journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. An Innovative Approach to a Potential NeuroprotectiveInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Timothy R LexDivision of Complex Drug Analysis, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, St. Louis, Missouri, 63110, USA.
Jason D RodriguezDivision of Complex Drug Analysis, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, St. Louis, Missouri, 63110, USA.
Lei ZhangOffice of Research and Standards, Office of Generic Drugs, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, 20993, USA.
Wenlei JiangOffice of Research and Standards, Office of Generic Drugs, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, 20993, USA. Wenlei.jiang@fda.hhs.gov.
Zongming GaoDivision of Complex Drug Analysis, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, St. Louis, Missouri, 63110, USA. Zongming.gao@fda.hhs.gov.
United States Food and Drug Administration · USCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In vitro dissolution testing is widely used to mimic and predict in vivo performance of oral drug products in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. This literature review assesses the current in vitro dissolution methodologies being employed to simulate and predict in vivo drug dissolution under fasted and fed conditions, with emphasis on immediate release (IR) solid oral dosage forms. Notable human GI physiological conditions under fasted and fed states have been reviewed and summarized. Literature results showed that dissolution media, mechanical forces, and transit times are key dissolution test parameters for simulating specific postprandial conditions. A number of biorelevant systems, including the fed stomach model (FSM), GastroDuo device, dynamic gastric model (DGM), simulated gastrointestinal tract models (TIM), and the human gastric simulator (HGS), have been developed to mimic the postprandial state of the stomach. While these models have assisted in expanding physiological relevance of in vitro dissolution tests, in general, these models lack the ability to fully replicate physiological conditions/processes. Furthermore, the translatability of in vitro data to an in vivo system remains challenging. Additionally, physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling has been employed to evaluate the effect of food on drug bioavailability and bioequivalence. Here, we assess the current status of in vitro dissolution methodologies and absorption PBPK modeling approaches to identify knowledge gaps and facilitate further development of in vitro dissolution methods that factor in fasted and fed states. Prediction of in vivo drug performance under fasted and fed conditions via in vitro dissolution testing and modeling may potentially help efforts in harmonizing global regulatory recommendations regarding in vivo fasted and fed bioequivalence studies for solid oral IR products.

Indexed as

Gastric EmptyingPostprandial PeriodAdministration, OralBiological AvailabilityHumansModels, BiologicalSolubilitybioequivalencedissolutionfed statein vitro model(s)oral drugphysiological model(s)

Identifiers

PMID35277760
OpenAlexW4220731749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.