ArticleCardiovascular and interventional radiology2022
Single Institution Outcome of Minimally Invasive Enterocutaneous Fistula Management Utilizing the Biodesign® Fistula Plug.
Article in Cardiovascular and interventional radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- Acellular Extracellular Matrix Scaffolds in Regenerative Medicine: Advances in Decellularization and Clinical Applications.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo report the outcomes of the Biodesign Fistula Plug as an alternative treatment for enterocutaneous fistulae by presenting our institutional experience from 2013 to 2020. MATERIALS AND
methodsA retrospective review of all attempted fistula closures utilizing the Biodesign Fistula Plug at a single institution from 2012 to 2020 was performed under IRB approval and in compliance with HIPAA. Patient demographics were obtained including age at the time of the procedure, etiology, location of the fistula, history of malignancy, prior chemotherapy or radiation, and history of prior surgery or other interventions. Patient follow-up was performed through 7/2020 to evaluate for fistula closure, complications, or subsequent treatments.
resultsThere were 25 patients who underwent 35 Biodesign Fistula Plug placements. Of these, 7 procedures were successful, defined as closure of the fistula, and 28 procedures were unsuccessful, defined as persistent fistula output or requiring further intervention on the EC fistula. There were 7 major complications, SIR classification D = 3, E = 2 and F = 2. No statistically significant risk factors were found predicting fistula plug failure although there was a trend towards patients with malignancy having unsuccessful outcome (p = 0.057). The average number of procedures for patients with successful closure was 1.4 versus 4.22 for those with unsuccessful closure. The average time to plug failure was 27.8 days (range 3-163 days), and the average time to fistula closure following plug placement was 21.4 days (range 14-30).
conclusionEnterocutaneous fistulae are complex and morbid with no good treatment options. These findings demonstrate the Biodesign Fistula Plug can be successful in select patients, however, should be used with great caution due to high rate of failure and complications including two patient deaths.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.