Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35277694›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Clinical oncology2022

COVID-19 vaccines in patients with cancer: immunogenicity, efficacy and safety.

Annika Fendler, Elisabeth G E de Vries, Corine H GeurtsvanKessel, John B Haanen, Bernhard Wörmann, Samra Turajlic, Marie von Lilienfeld-Toal

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Clinical oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 128 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
128citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
20.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

128 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 207 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article

68 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Annika Fendler *Cancer Dynamics Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7267-0981
Elisabeth G E de Vries *Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8949-7425
Corine H GeurtsvanKesselDepartment of Viroscience, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
John B HaanenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5884-7704
Bernhard WörmannDivision of Hematology, Oncology and Tumour Immunology, Department of Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Samra TurajlicCancer Dynamics Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8846-136X
Marie von Lilienfeld-ToalDepartment of Haematology and Medical Oncology, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany. Marie.von_Lilienfeld-Toal@med.uni-jena.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9756-3541
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEErasmus University Rotterdam · NLJena University Hospital · DERoyal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GBThe Francis Crick Institute · GBThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

Cancer Research UK 29911Cancer Research UK C50947/A18176Cancer Research UK FC001002Cancer Research UK FC001030Cancer Research UK FC001078Cancer Research UK FC001099Cancer Research UK FC001169Cancer Research UK FC001218Cancer Research UK FC001988Medical Research Council FC001002Medical Research Council FC001030Medical Research Council FC001078Medical Research Council FC001099Medical Research Council FC001169Medical Research Council FC001218Medical Research Council FC001988Wellcome Trust FC001002Wellcome Trust FC001030Wellcome Trust FC001078Wellcome Trust FC001099Wellcome Trust FC001169Wellcome Trust FC001218Wellcome Trust FC001988
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with cancer have a higher risk of severe coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and associated mortality than the general population. Owing to this increased risk, patients with cancer have been prioritized for COVID-19 vaccination globally, for both primary and booster vaccinations. However, given that these patients were not included in the pivotal clinical trials, considerable uncertainty remains regarding vaccine efficacy, and the extent of humoral and cellular immune responses in these patients, as well as the risks of vaccine-related adverse events. In this Review, we summarize the current knowledge generated in studies conducted since COVID-19 vaccines first became available. We also highlight critical points that might affect vaccine efficacy in patients with cancer in the future.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesNeoplasmsHumansImmunogenicity, VaccineSARS-CoV-2VaccinationCOVID-19 Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID35277694
PMCPMC8916486
OpenAlexW4221060091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.