Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35277591›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Environment and body-brain interplay affect inhibition and decision-making.

Pierre Bouny, Marion Trousselard, Sandrine Jacob, François Vialatte, Charles Verdonk

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 60% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pierre BounyDepartment of Neurosciences and Cognitive Sciences, Unit of Neurophysiology of Stress, French Armed Forces Biomedical Research Institute, 91220, Brétigny-sur-Orge, France.
Marion TrousselardDepartment of Neurosciences and Cognitive Sciences, Unit of Neurophysiology of Stress, French Armed Forces Biomedical Research Institute, 91220, Brétigny-sur-Orge, France.
Sandrine JacobDepartment of Neurosciences and Cognitive Sciences, Unit of Neurophysiology of Stress, French Armed Forces Biomedical Research Institute, 91220, Brétigny-sur-Orge, France.
François VialatteESPCI Paris - PSL University, 75005, Paris, France.
Charles VerdonkDepartment of Neurosciences and Cognitive Sciences, Unit of Neurophysiology of Stress, French Armed Forces Biomedical Research Institute, 91220, Brétigny-sur-Orge, France. verdonk.charles@gmail.com.
Université Paris Sciences et Lettres · FRService de Santé des Armées · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The fine-tuned interplay of brain and body underlies human ability to cope with changes in the internal and external milieus. Previous research showed that cardiac interoceptive changes (e.g., cardiac phase) affect cognitive functions, notably inhibition that is a key element for adaptive behaviour. Here we investigated the influence on cognition of vestibular signal, which provides the brain with sensory information about body position and movement. We used a centrifuge-based design to disrupt vestibular signal in healthy human volunteers while their inhibition and decision-making functions were assessed with the stop-signal paradigm. Participants performed the standard and a novel, sensorial version of the stop-signal task to determine whether disrupted vestibular signal influences cognition as a function of its relevance to the context. First, we showed that disrupted vestibular signal was associated with a larger variability of longest inhibition latencies, meaning that participants were even slower to inhibit in the trials where they had the most difficulty inhibiting. Second, we revealed that processing of bodily information, as required in the sensorial stop-signal task, also led to a larger variability of longest inhibition latencies, which was all the more important when vestibular signal was disrupted. Lastly, we found that such a degraded response inhibition performance was due in part to the acceleration of decision-making process, meaning that participants made a decision more quickly even when strength of sensory evidence was reduced. Taken together, these novel findings provide direct evidence that vestibular signal affects the cognitive functions of inhibition and decision-making.

Indexed as

Inhibition, PsychologicalVestibule, LabyrinthBrainCognitionHumans

Identifiers

PMID35277591
PMCPMC8917140
OpenAlexW4220662420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.