Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35277583›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Dysbiotic change in gastric microbiome and its functional implication in gastric carcinogenesis.

Jae Yong Park, Hochan Seo, Chil-Sung Kang, Tae-Seop Shin, Jong Won Kim, Joong-Min Park, Jae Gyu Kim, Yoon-Keun Kim

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
12.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jae Yong Park *Department of Internal Medicine, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, 102 Heukseok-ro, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, 06973, Republic of Korea.
Hochan Seo *MD Healthcare R&D Institute, World Cup Buk-ro 56-gil, Mapo-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Chil-Sung KangMD Healthcare R&D Institute, World Cup Buk-ro 56-gil, Mapo-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Tae-Seop ShinMD Healthcare R&D Institute, World Cup Buk-ro 56-gil, Mapo-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jong Won KimDepartment of Surgery, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Joong-Min ParkDepartment of Surgery, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jae Gyu KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, 102 Heukseok-ro, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, 06973, Republic of Korea. jgkimd@cau.ac.kr.
Yoon-Keun KimMD Healthcare R&D Institute, World Cup Buk-ro 56-gil, Mapo-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea. ykkim@mdhc.kr.
Chung-Ang University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although there is a growing interest in the role of gastric microbiome on the development of gastric cancer, the exact mechanism is largely unknown. We aimed to investigate the changes of gastric microbiome during gastric carcinogenesis, and to predict the functional potentials of the microbiome involved in the cancer development. The gastric microbiome was analyzed using gastric juice samples from 88 prospectively enrolled patients, who were classified into gastritis, gastric adenoma, or early/advanced gastric cancer group. Differences in microbial diversity and composition were analyzed with 16S rRNA gene profiling, using next-generation sequencing method. Metagenomic biomarkers were selected using logistic regression models, based on relative abundances at genus level. We used Tax4Fun to predict possible functional pathways of gastric microbiome involved in the carcinogenesis. The microbial diversity continuously decreased in its sequential process of gastric carcinogenesis, from gastritis to gastric cancer. The microbial composition was significantly different among the four groups of each disease status, as well as between the cancer group and non-cancer group. Gastritis group was differently enriched with genera Akkermansia and Lachnospiraceae NK4A136 Group, whereas the cancer group was enriched with Lactobacillus and Veillonella. Predictive analysis of the functional capacity of the microbiome suggested enrichment or depletion of several functional pathways related to carcinogenesis in the cancer group. There are significant changes in the diversity and composition of gastric microbiome during the gastric carcinogenesis process. Gastric cancer was characterized with microbial dysbiosis, along with functional changes potentially favoring carcinogenesis.

Indexed as

GastritisGastrointestinal MicrobiomeStomach NeoplasmsCarcinogenesisDysbiosisHumansRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID35277583
PMCPMC8917121
OpenAlexW4220653149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.