Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35277533›Full record

ArticleScientific data2022

MOFSimplify, machine learning models with extracted stability data of three thousand metal-organic frameworks.

Aditya Nandy, Gianmarco Terrones, Naveen Arunachalam, Chenru Duan, David W Kastner, Heather J Kulik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. MOFGPT: Generative Design of Metal-Organic Frameworks using Language Models.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Evaluating CHACS applied materials & interfaces · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Accelerated Discovery of Metal-Organic Frameworks for COIndustrial & engineering chemistry research · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Open-Source Machine Learning in Computational Chemistry.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Aditya Nandy *Department of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7137-5449
Gianmarco Terrones *Department of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.
Naveen ArunachalamDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9318-3595
Chenru DuanDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.
David W KastnerDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.
Heather J KulikDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA. hjkulik@mit.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9342-0191

Funding

DOE | SC | Basic Energy Sciences (BES) DE-SC0012702National Science Foundation (NSF) 1122374United States Department of Defense | Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) D18AP00039United States Department of Defense | United States Navy | Office of Naval Research (ONR) N00014-20-1-2150
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We report a workflow and the output of a natural language processing (NLP)-based procedure to mine the extant metal-organic framework (MOF) literature describing structurally characterized MOFs and their solvent removal and thermal stabilities. We obtain over 2,000 solvent removal stability measures from text mining and 3,000 thermal decomposition temperatures from thermogravimetric analysis data. We assess the validity of our NLP methods and the accuracy of our extracted data by comparing to a hand-labeled subset. Machine learning (ML, i.e. artificial neural network) models trained on this data using graph- and pore-geometry-based representations enable prediction of stability on new MOFs with quantified uncertainty. Our web interface, MOFSimplify, provides users access to our curated data and enables them to harness that data for predictions on new MOFs. MOFSimplify also encourages community feedback on existing data and on ML model predictions for community-based active learning for improved MOF stability models.

Identifiers

PMID35277533
PMCPMC8917177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.