Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35277459›Full record

ArticleJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2022

Neoadjuvant in situ vaccination with cowpea mosaic virus as a novel therapy against canine inflammatory mammary cancer.

Daniel Alonso-Miguel, Guillermo Valdivia, Diego Guerrera, Maria Dolores Perez-Alenza, Stanislav Pantelyushin, Angela Alonso-Diez, Veronique Beiss, Steven Fiering, Nicole F Steinmetz, Maria Suarez-Redondo and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Daniel Alonso-Miguel *Department of Animal Medicine, Surgery and Pathology, Mammary Oncology Unit, Veterinary Teaching Hospital, Veterinary Medicine School, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4106-2278
Guillermo Valdivia *Department of Animal Medicine, Surgery and Pathology, Mammary Oncology Unit, Veterinary Teaching Hospital, Veterinary Medicine School, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6969-1597
Diego GuerreraInstitute of Laboratory Animal Science, University of Zurich, Schlieren, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-5323-4447
Maria Dolores Perez-AlenzaDepartment of Animal Medicine, Surgery and Pathology, Mammary Oncology Unit, Veterinary Teaching Hospital, Veterinary Medicine School, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0426-0083
Stanislav PantelyushinInstitute of Laboratory Animal Science, University of Zurich, Schlieren, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-3490-3860
Angela Alonso-DiezDepartment of Animal Medicine, Surgery and Pathology, Mammary Oncology Unit, Veterinary Teaching Hospital, Veterinary Medicine School, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0296-2348
Veronique BeissDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0953-053X
Steven FieringDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, and Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth and Dartmouth Hitchcock Health, Dartmouth College Geisel School of Medicine, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0624-974X
Nicole F SteinmetzDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0130-0481
Maria Suarez-RedondoDepartment of Animal Medicine, Surgery and Pathology, Mammary Oncology Unit, Veterinary Teaching Hospital, Veterinary Medicine School, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8689-2713
Johannes Vom BergInstitute of Laboratory Animal Science, University of Zurich, Schlieren, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4086-1564
Laura Peña *Department of Animal Medicine, Surgery and Pathology, Mammary Oncology Unit, Veterinary Teaching Hospital, Veterinary Medicine School, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7135-6280
Hugo Arias-Pulido *Department of Microbiology and Immunology, and Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth and Dartmouth Hitchcock Health, Dartmouth College Geisel School of Medicine, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA hugo.ariaspulido@dartmouth.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-4941-1110
Universidad Complutense de Madrid · ESUniversity of Zurich · CHDartmouth College · USUniversity of California San Diego · US

Funding

Dual-pronged nano-drug delivery using plant virus-like particles.R01CA224605 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Nicole Franziska Steinmetz · 2017 to 2026
$4.0M
Overcoming the immune-suppressive tumor microenvironment through in situ vaccination nanotechnology.U01CA218292 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI FIERING, STEVEN, STEINMETZ, NICOLE FRANZISKA · 2017 to 2021
$3.0M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA224605NCI NIH HHS U01 CA218292
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInflammatory mammary cancer (IMC), the counterpart of human inflammatory breast cancer (IBC), is the deadliest form of canine mammary tumors. IMC patients lack specific therapy and have poor outcomes. This proof-of-principle preclinical study evaluated the efficacy, safety, and effect on survival of neoadjuvant intratumoral (in situ) empty cowpea mosaic virus (eCPMV) immunotherapy in companion dogs diagnosed with IMC.

methodsTen IMC-bearing dogs were enrolled in the study. Five dogs received medical therapy, and five received weekly neoadjuvant in situ eCPMV immunotherapy (0.2-0.4 mg per injection) and medical therapy after the second eCPMV injection. Efficacy was evaluated by reduction of tumor growth; safety by hematological and biochemistry changes in blood and plasma; and patient outcome by survival analysis. eCPMV-induced immune changes in blood cells were analyzed by flow cytometry; changes in the tumor microenvironment were evaluated by CD3 (T lymphocytes), CD20 (B lymphocytes), FoxP3 (Treg lymphocytes), myeloperoxidase (MPO; neutrophils), Ki-67 (proliferation index, PI; tumor cell proliferation), and Cleaved Caspase-3 (CC-3; apoptosis) immunohistochemistry.

resultsTwo neoadjuvant in situ eCPMV injections resulted in tumor shrinkage in all patients by day 14 without systemic adverse events. Although surgery for IMC is generally not an option, reduction in tumor size allowed surgery in two IMC patients. In peripheral blood, in situ eCPMV immunotherapy was associated with a significant decrease of Treg

conclusionsNeoadjuvant in situ eCPMV immunotherapy demonstrated anti-tumor efficacy and improved survival in IMC patients without systemic adverse effects. eCPMV-induced changes in immune cells point to neutrophils as a driver of immune response. Neoadjuvant in situ eCPMV immunotherapy could be a groundbreaking immunotherapy for canine IMC and a potential future immunotherapy for human IBC patients.

Indexed as

ComovirusInflammatory Breast NeoplasmsNeoplasmsAnimalsDogsForkhead Transcription FactorsHumansKi-67 AntigenNeoadjuvant TherapyTumor MicroenvironmentVaccinationForkhead Transcription FactorsKi-67 Antigenbreast neoplasmsdrug evaluation, preclinicalimmunogenicity, vaccineneutrophil Infiltrationvaccination

Identifiers

PMID35277459
PMCPMC8919457
OpenAlexW4220921932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.